|
Post by The Rocketmen on Nov 20, 2013 8:49:27 GMT -5
josh rosenthal vs. a not guilty verdict. id like to see that one more.
|
|
|
Post by The Sandmen on Nov 24, 2013 0:53:50 GMT -5
Depends. I mean, if it goes all OJ, and we are Not Guilty-ing people who are guilty as a dog piss, then thumbs down. You have a Chicago-sized warehouse of drugs, you should probably be a little bit guilty. What, did people sneak them into his warehouse? Come come, now, Joshy-boy. Fuck.
|
|
|
Post by xx - Team GAP on Nov 25, 2013 3:12:08 GMT -5
I'd prefer to see fedor or evans win over big named talents
|
|
|
Post by The Sandmen on Nov 25, 2013 3:26:05 GMT -5
I would too. Unfortunately, they still need some work. Rashad vs. Fedor next?
|
|
|
Post by xx - Team GAP on Nov 25, 2013 3:49:53 GMT -5
it's a win -win for me if we do that.. course it's also a lose-lose for me at the same time.
|
|
|
Post by The Rocketmen on Nov 25, 2013 9:50:30 GMT -5
i like that i just now saw your response to the rosenthal fiasco and i like that we are now hating on him for a trial that never happened yet lol
|
|
|
Post by The Sandmen on Nov 25, 2013 16:32:27 GMT -5
Totally. If someone is accused of something publicly, it's our duty as citizens to presume they are guilty without hearing any evidence.
|
|
|
Post by The Rocketmen on Nov 25, 2013 16:50:09 GMT -5
DEATH TO RACISM
|
|
|
Post by The Sandmen on Nov 25, 2013 17:09:34 GMT -5
And to people who have warehouses full of pot plants. Whether they actually do or not!
|
|
|
Post by xx - Team GAP on Nov 26, 2013 5:55:52 GMT -5
DEATH TO FACTUAL EVIDENCE!!!!!! Nobody needs that kinda shit around.
|
|
|
Post by The Rocketmen on Nov 26, 2013 8:33:27 GMT -5
agreed
|
|