|
Post by The Rocketmen on Aug 5, 2015 14:47:48 GMT -5
Kruze vs. Only Having an Argument Once
Definition of Disparaging:
-expressing the opinion that something is of little worth; derogatory.
In this dictionary, the label Disparaging indicates that a term or definition is used with a deliberate intent to disparage, as to belittle a particular ethnic, religious, or social group. It is often paired with the label Offensive, which describes a term that gives offense whether or not any offense was intended.
|
|
|
Post by The Sandmen on Aug 5, 2015 15:15:12 GMT -5
"Kruze vs" is not disparaging. It absolutely is, especially when it's multiple threads... then you wonder why I'm so pissed off with you half the time, as if you have no clue. lol Who did you say had problems with interpretation? lol.
|
|
|
Post by xx - Former Phoenix Fight Club on Aug 5, 2015 23:48:02 GMT -5
Kruze vs. Only Having an Argument Once Definition of Disparaging: -expressing the opinion that something is of little worth; derogatory. In this dictionary, the label Disparaging indicates that a term or definition is used with a deliberate intent to disparage, as to belittle a particular ethnic, religious, or social group. It is often paired with the label Offensive, which describes a term that gives offense whether or not any offense was intended. Yep, but it's not limited to ethnic, religious, or social groups; can also be individuals... and by creating multiple threads, and calling them "Kruze vs. _____", it is an attempt at belittlement by Sandman. It absolutely is, especially when it's multiple threads... then you wonder why I'm so pissed off with you half the time, as if you have no clue. lol Who did you say had problems with interpretation? lol. You. There was no need for multiple threads moved. You're the admin. It's all on you since no one else can move threads.
|
|
|
Post by The Rocketmen on Aug 6, 2015 0:29:14 GMT -5
I like that I show what disparaging actually means, so you change it to belittlement. Interesting. Almost like trying to jam your own opinion down everyone else's throat is belittling them for not allowing them the same respect to their opinion as you demand, excessively, for your own. I see.
|
|
|
Post by The Sandmen on Aug 6, 2015 0:32:21 GMT -5
I am confused....I never said I did not move the threads. Of course I fucking moved them. What are we even arguing about here?
Also, since I am admin and you are not, let me fill you in on some admin stuff. If you move a bunch of posts into the same thread, it orders them by date posted. So absolutely none of the 3-5 concurrent arguments would have made any sense in 1 thread. And they were moved to keep the fighting out of the other threads. It worked, so there is nothing to be unhappy about. Everyone wins.
|
|
|
Post by xx - Former Phoenix Fight Club on Aug 6, 2015 0:33:06 GMT -5
I like that I show what disparaging actually means, so you change it to belittlement. Interesting. Almost like trying to jam your own opinion down everyone else's throat is belittling them for not allowing them the same respect to their opinion as you demand, excessively, for your own. I see. It was in your little definition there bud... In this dictionary, the label Disparaging indicates that a term or definition is used with a deliberate intent to disparage, as to belittle a particular ethnic, religious, or social group. It is often paired with the label Offensive, which describes a term that gives offense whether or not any offense was intended. I didn't change a damn thing. I used you own definition from your own dictionary you used. lol What did I change exactly?
|
|
|
Post by The Rocketmen on Aug 6, 2015 0:48:55 GMT -5
I don't see how titling something without anything derogatory is belittling nor disparaging.
|
|
|
Post by xx - Former Phoenix Fight Club on Aug 6, 2015 12:30:04 GMT -5
I don't see how titling something without anything derogatory is belittling nor disparaging. There are 4 "Kruze vs. ______" threads... All of which were titled so by Sandman to troll me. He claims I'm the one obsessed with him, yet he's the one creating multiple threads with my name on them meant to belittle (make someone or something seem unimportant), disparage (regard or represent as being of little worth) all simply to be derogatory and deprecate me then mask it by saying it's an "administrative move" to stop Kruze from "raging" on the fight threads. Well, I'm not, nor was I, raging, especially in this one he moved. There's nothing administrative about trolling.
|
|
|
Post by The Sandmen on Aug 6, 2015 12:40:44 GMT -5
I already addressed why there were 4 threads, bro-bo. Scroll up.
(Also, you will see you get no special treatment, as there is an "Underdogs vs" thread as well. You are not special and you get no special treatment)
|
|
|
Post by The Rocketmen on Aug 6, 2015 14:07:13 GMT -5
lol it's weird to me how quickly people can yell at someone and then run to call the bullying police to cry wolf. What we should be crying is chocolate tears.
|
|
|
Post by The Rocketmen on Aug 6, 2015 15:47:21 GMT -5
NO ONE CARES
|
|
|
Post by xx - Former Phoenix Fight Club on Aug 6, 2015 16:09:57 GMT -5
I already addressed why there were 4 threads, bro-bo. Scroll up. (Also, you will see you get no special treatment, as there is an "Underdogs vs" thread as well. You are not special and you get no special treatment) No, I saw it... You addressed nothing except more babbled about "arguments" that either, didn't exist in the first place as it was in this thread, or were perpetuated by your own actions. There was maybe one that I was a direct cause of, the rest were all blatant trolls by you to continue and further any argument(s) that you seemed to think existed because you were pissed off about something else, and along with that you drag me along through the mud to do so by putting my name in the title to continue with perpetuating this myth that I'm sort of a problem to the entire site, when the only problem that I really pose is to you, because we rarely agree on anything and you don't like the fact that you can't convince to your side a majority of the time. You take that personally, and we see 4 different threads like this at the same time. So you can bring up your one thread you moved about UnderDogs, one time, all you like, but the fact remains that you are giving me special treatment and focusing a spotlight on me with 4 threads instead of just one, for whatever reason. So, if I'm supposedly not receiving special treatment, albeit negative, why then do you need to have 4 threads for the obvious purpose of trolling than any administrative act you keep claiming as the reasoning?
|
|
|
Post by The Rocketmen on Aug 6, 2015 16:14:08 GMT -5
NO ONE CARES
|
|
|
Post by The Sandmen on Aug 6, 2015 18:14:08 GMT -5
TL;DR
Moral: I used to care, but I don't now, due to too much length times 15 threads.
We can all agree no one gives a shit though and move on with our lives in a more upbeat manner, that's for sure.
|
|
|
Post by The Rocketmen on Aug 6, 2015 19:23:54 GMT -5
I don't give a shit about your comment.
|
|