|
Post by xx - Former Bulldozers on Apr 11, 2017 8:02:41 GMT -5
Reject?
|
|
|
Post by The Rocketmen on Apr 11, 2017 8:47:02 GMT -5
POINTS PROCESSED
|
|
|
Post by The Sandmen on Apr 14, 2017 21:51:36 GMT -5
PROCESSED
|
|
|
Post by xx - Former Bulldozers on Apr 14, 2017 22:58:12 GMT -5
Reject
|
|
|
Post by xx - Team GAP on Apr 14, 2017 23:51:04 GMT -5
Processed?? Even though there were objections to this trade going through? Really? Ok... do what u want.
|
|
|
Post by The Sandmen on Apr 15, 2017 0:01:55 GMT -5
Processed?? Even though there were objections to this trade going through? Really? Ok... do what u want. The objection was not a serious one. It has to do with an on-going beef between Bulldozers & Rattlesnakes, a failed troll attempt, and, incidently, a lot of subsequent trades. xx - Former Bulldozers, your idiot posts are confusing people. Unless you have a legitimate beef with something, stop running around posting reject. If you do have a legit-beef, post your reasons. Dumbass.
|
|
|
Post by xx - Former Bulldozers on Apr 15, 2017 0:05:02 GMT -5
Reject?
|
|
|
Post by xx - Former Bulldozers on Apr 15, 2017 0:05:49 GMT -5
But seriously I reject my own rejections based on the fact that my own rejected rejections should be rejected for being a rejected rejection by myself. Did I mention reject?
|
|
|
Post by The Sandmen on Apr 15, 2017 0:07:50 GMT -5
...dumbass.
|
|
|
Post by xx - Former Bulldozers on Apr 15, 2017 0:14:05 GMT -5
Reject?
|
|
|
Post by xx - Team GAP on Apr 15, 2017 0:21:46 GMT -5
I thought i posted an objection due to it being a lot of points being traded... i didnt feel the fighter was worth that amount of points.... but you know.. ignore me and my opinions.
|
|
|
Post by The Sandmen on Apr 15, 2017 1:36:52 GMT -5
I thought i posted an objection due to it being a lot of points being traded... i didnt feel the fighter was worth that amount of points.... but you know.. ignore me and my opinions. You posted this. Seems like a lot of points for franklin. This is not a reject. It is a passive statement of opinion, with a contemplative tone. If this is a reject, you need to be MUCH clearer. Words like "seems" are incredibly passive, and no where did you use any words like, "Reject", "object", "We should not let this go through", or even "no". In fact, you did not post a single negative word in your whole reply. If you feel like a trade is terrible, you need to be much more assertive and clear. When you post a passive reply like this, it's unlikely to be taken as a serious, outright rejection. As I said, it sounds more like you just sort of think its a lot for a fighter. Not "too much", just..."a lot". Not to mention, you need to say why you think it is too much for Franklin. I mean, we're talking about a perpetual top fighter. At the time of this post, I believe he was a #1 Contender for the MW championship. We're also looking at a bidding war, as well as no clear signs or reason that this is a case of one member trying to shadily help out another one. Given the reasons we have rejected things in the past, I don't see what makes this one particularly absurd. Especially since Askren just went for 10 points, then again for 15. This seems to be fair, open-market value for these top tier fighters at this point.
|
|
|
Post by The Sandmen on Apr 15, 2017 1:58:23 GMT -5
More importantly than all that, though, xx - Team GAP, the reason you need your objections to be crystal damned clear - that draft pick was used to draft a fighter nearly 4 days ago. Even if I wanted to go back on it now, we'd pretty much need to start half the draft over again and undo about 4 trades. It would be the most epic of debacles. Rejections are good - have those. But please, make it really clear that 1) you object to a trade, and 2) WHY you think it should be rejected.
|
|
|
Post by xx - Team GAP on Apr 15, 2017 10:01:42 GMT -5
More importantly than all that, though, xx - Team GAP, the reason you need your objections to be crystal damned clear - that draft pick was used to draft a fighter nearly 4 days ago. Even if I wanted to go back on it now, we'd pretty much need to start half the draft over again and undo about 4 trades. It would be the most epic of debacles. Rejections are good - have those. But please, make it really clear that 1) you object to a trade, and 2) WHY you think it should be rejected. You are right. I need to be more clear. However you need to get it that if i give a reason for something against the current topic.. i am very obviously objecting to it. It may not be a full rejection.. it may be me giving you a concern i have about said thing (in this case a trade)... beside that how is this for being clear?... your an asshole.(obviously a joke lol)
|
|
|
Post by xx - Former Bulldozers on Apr 15, 2017 10:04:53 GMT -5
Reject?
|
|