|
|
Post by The Texas Rattlesnakes on Aug 22, 2017 23:21:46 GMT -5
Do it Dozers!!! Also, Luke and I talked and we will pm you our roster, Justin. Dozers do the same. 2 per weight class
|
|
|
|
Post by xx - The King's Poison on Aug 23, 2017 0:13:04 GMT -5
Zenith will wipe out like 3 of my best fighters lmao, of course you'd want it there. My one stipulation is it happens before Zenith so I can have my BEST team vs your BEST team. Sure there can be stipulations, what would you like? If we win, your weekly salary is split up, and given to Austin and I until the end of the season. If you win, I will give you my entire salary every other week until the end of the season. |
|
|
|
Post by The Texas Rattlesnakes on Aug 23, 2017 0:15:23 GMT -5
Zenith will wipe out like 3 of my best fighters lmao, of course you'd want it there. My one stipulation is it happens before Zenith so I can have my BEST team vs your BEST team. Sure there can be stipulations, what would you like? If we win, your weekly salary is split up, and given to Austin and I until the end of the season. If you win, I will give you my entire salary every other week until the end of the season. You seriously think Dozers would agree to that, then you're dumb. |
|
|
|
Post by The Sandmen on Aug 23, 2017 1:14:39 GMT -5
Yeah, there are 2 of you, vs. 1 of him. If you wanna do that kind of crazy stipulation, nut the fuck up about it and make it more like:
If we win, your weekly salary is split up, and given to Austin and I until the end of the season.
If you win, WE will give you OUR entire salaries every other week until the end of the season.
I don't see why Rattlesnakes should get the benefit if he wins, but no risk if he loses. Seems unfair.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Texas Rattlesnakes on Aug 23, 2017 1:21:33 GMT -5
Yeah, there are 2 of you, vs. 1 of him. If you wanna do that kind of crazy stipulation, nut the fuck up about it and make it more like: If we win, your weekly salary is split up, and given to Austin and I until the end of the season.
If you win, WE will give you OUR entire salaries every other week until the end of the season.I don't see why Rattlesnakes should get the benefit if he wins, but no risk if he loses. Seems unfair. That's what I was texting him about. He wanted it to happen like that originally, and I said i'm not giving my entire salary, you do that, and then Luke made that. |
|
|
|
Post by The Sandmen on Aug 23, 2017 1:22:57 GMT -5
Puss.
|
|
|
|
Post by xx - The King's Poison on Aug 23, 2017 1:25:17 GMT -5
Austin wouldn't agree to give up his entire salary, and if we did it how I explained then dozers would make more. I'll say I'll give him one point every week then if he wins, and he gives me one point every week. Or Austin can give a point every other week and I'll still give two every other.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Texas Rattlesnakes on Aug 23, 2017 1:26:11 GMT -5
Austin wouldn't agree to give up his entire salary, and if we did it how I explained then dozers would make more. I'll say I'll give him one point every week then if he wins, and he gives me one point every week. Or Austin can give a point every other week and I'll still give two every other. I'll do that. Give one point every other week? Sure. That's if we lose though. |
|
|
|
Post by The Sandmen on Aug 23, 2017 1:28:15 GMT -5
and if we did it how I explained then dozers would make more. He is also taking on two teams in this challenge. Risk ratio of 1 vs. 2 = payout ratio of 2:1. Makes sense to me. |
|
|
|
Post by xx - The King's Poison on Aug 23, 2017 1:30:57 GMT -5
and if we did it how I explained then dozers would make more. He is also taking on two teams in this challenge. Risk ratio of 1 vs. 2 = payout ratio of 2:1. Makes sense to me. I have no idea what that means |
|
|
|
Post by The Sandmen on Aug 23, 2017 1:37:13 GMT -5
It means you guys and your petty little stipulations are goddamned cowards. Man the fuck up and make a real challenge, instead of being afraid of another team when you are two full teams against one lone team. You have 2 teams (meaning twice as many upgrades, points, etc). Vs. one guy.
To put the pussiness of your stipulations into perspective, take a look at this challenge I made to Austin a week or so ago:
After listening to Rattlesnakes prattle on about how Cody Garbrandt was the best ever, I challenged Rattlesnakes.
Anderson Silva vs. Cody Garbrandt (at Catchweight).
If Anderson won:
- Cody Garbrandt would no longer have a perfect rookie season.
- If he injured Cody, Cody would forfeit his then-upcoming title shot.
- Anderson's 100th win would be against Cody, and he would be Cody's first loss. Forever.
If Cody won:
- I would publicly admit he was the best rookie we ever had, without reservation.
- Rattlesnakes would get Anderson Silva.
He declined my challenge.
You kids are all talk, and once some risk comes about, even when its 2 on fucking 1, your guts turn to jello. Nut-up or shut up kids.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Texas Rattlesnakes on Aug 23, 2017 1:40:36 GMT -5
It means you guys and your petty little stipulations are goddamned cowards. Man the fuck up and make a real challenge, instead of being afraid of another team when you are two full teams against one lone team. You have 2 teams (meaning twice as many upgrades, points, etc). Vs. one guy. To put the pussiness of your stipulations into perspective, take a look at this challenge I made to Austin a week or so ago: After listening to Rattlesnakes prattle on about how Cody Garbrandt was the best ever, I challenged Rattlesnakes. Anderson Silva vs. Cody Garbrandt (at Catchweight). If Anderson won: - Cody Garbrandt would no longer have a perfect rookie season. - If he injured Cody, Cody would forfeit his then-upcoming title shot. - Anderson's 100th win would be against Cody, and he would be Cody's first loss. Forever. If Cody won: - I would publicly admit he was the best rookie we ever had, without reservation. - Rattlesnakes would get Anderson Silva. He declined my challenge. You kids are all talk, and once some risk comes about, even when its 2 on fucking 1, your guts turn to jello. Nut-up or shut up kids. That risk was pretty damn extreme. Cody's chances of beating Anderson were very slim making it high risk low reward. |
|
|
|
Post by xx - The King's Poison on Aug 23, 2017 1:42:22 GMT -5
It means you guys and your petty little stipulations are goddamned cowards. Man the fuck up and make a real challenge, instead of being afraid of another team when you are two full teams against one lone team. You have 2 teams (meaning twice as many upgrades, points, etc). Vs. one guy. To put the pussiness of your stipulations into perspective, take a look at this challenge I made to Austin a week or so ago: After listening to Rattlesnakes prattle on about how Cody Garbrandt was the best ever, I challenged Rattlesnakes. Anderson Silva vs. Cody Garbrandt (at Catchweight). If Anderson won: - Cody Garbrandt would no longer have a perfect rookie season. - If he injured Cody, Cody would forfeit his then-upcoming title shot. - Anderson's 100th win would be against Cody, and he would be Cody's first loss. Forever. If Cody won: - I would publicly admit he was the best rookie we ever had, without reservation. - Rattlesnakes would get Anderson Silva. He declined my challenge. You kids are all talk, and once some risk comes about, even when its 2 on fucking 1, your guts turn to jello. Nut-up or shut up kids. That risk was pretty damn extreme. Cody's chances of beating Anderson were very slim making it high risk low reward. Emilia Clarke would be disappointed in you. |
|
|
|
Post by The Texas Rattlesnakes on Aug 23, 2017 1:42:44 GMT -5
That risk was pretty damn extreme. Cody's chances of beating Anderson were very slim making it high risk low reward. Emilia Clarke would be disappointed in you. Oh fuck off |
|
|
|
Post by The Sandmen on Aug 23, 2017 1:45:24 GMT -5
That risk was pretty damn extreme. Cody's chances of beating Anderson were very slim making it high risk low reward. Risk: Cody loses. Worst case: He loses, gets hurt, and has to wait a little longer to win a belt. Reward: Anderson Silva. Yours. Forever. It was just further proof you are all talk and no rock, kid. If you think someone is the best, back it up. Or back away and let real men do the talking. |
|
Have 9 points in celebration of this monumental achievement!
Jan 21, 2021 13:09:55 GMT -5
*
Have 9 points in celebration of this monumental achievement!
Jan 21, 2021 13:09:55 GMT -5
*
