Cuts?

[The Rocketmen]

So what's the final thought, Jerry?

[xx - Camp Cannon]

Well if you cut a fighter and claim a new created fighter they might suck as well then well have a fa of sucky fighters

[The Sandmen]

final verdict seems to be let the league get watered down with stale, neglected 1-9 fighters. Yay for taking up the spots of serious contenders for these shit-boxes...

[Ferocity]

hey you're the booker. don't book 'em/

[xx - Former Phoenix Fight Club]

Oct 4, 2012 14:06:43 GMT -5 Ferocity said:

hey you're the booker. don't book 'em/

He can't just not book them either. lol I think just not booking them alot is the answer here. We have contender-ish type that are sitting for more than their alloted 4-6 cards. Those fighters should be given fight before the ones that are losing. It's better to have the GMs be in control of their own cuts cuz if they're just cut... they're cut and you get nothing for that fighter; he/she is just gone off your roster and you're short benched... That's my opinion anyways.


Oh... And just for HammerFists:

[The Sandmen]

Don;t you see the problem with that though? You, as teams, have a lot less control that way, than if your guys are booked regularly and you have the option to keep them alive through upgrades. You can't control me booking them once a season. But you can control keeping them in the mix through upgrades.