|
|
Post by Lord Byron's Conquistadors on Sept 18, 2013 19:31:47 GMT -5
anyone want rosi sexton??? I didn know I had her. post offers here its faster for me than my invox k?
|
|
|
|
Post by The Rocketmen on Sept 18, 2013 19:56:37 GMT -5
2 points
|
|
|
|
Post by Lord Byron's Conquistadors on Sept 19, 2013 22:15:28 GMT -5
probably give me nother day???
|
|
|
|
Post by The Rocketmen on Sept 19, 2013 23:46:47 GMT -5
k
|
|
|
|
Post by The Sandmen on Sept 20, 2013 3:26:59 GMT -5
Okay, so I would do 2 points but I wanna be clear about my intent. I would have no interest in keeping Sexton (i would be swapping her as soon as I got her). So if Rocketmen actually wants Rosi Sexton, he can do the trade. If he wants the body for swap, my 2 point offer is also on the table and you can take whatever one you like. update: Lord Byron's Conquistadors, she is your only woman, if you could, I would recommend you try to get a woman in her place should you make the Grand Prix. I do not have one to offer in this trade, unfortunately. |
|
|
|
Post by The Sandmen on Sept 20, 2013 22:51:20 GMT -5
withdraw offer. spent points elsewhere. sorry for any inconvenience.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Rocketmen on Sept 21, 2013 2:12:27 GMT -5
withdraw offer, also spent points
|
|
|
|
Post by xx - Former Phoenix Fight Club on Sept 21, 2013 16:23:42 GMT -5
@ The Sandmen & The Rocketmen: You fellas couldn't just offer Lord Byron's Conquistadors points for her anyways, unfortunately... :-/ Our new rules require everyone to have atleast 1 women on our rosters, Sexton is Byron's only female fighter. My suggestion to you, Byron, if don't want her, is to swap her out for another woman off the FA (Swap List) if you can't find someone to trade 1 for 1 for her or whatever. It's probably your best bet and you'll probably get a better league fighter; ie. Kelly Kobold or something.  Good luck.  |
|
|
|
Post by The Rocketmen on Sept 21, 2013 19:31:52 GMT -5
Yeah, that;s why I went with Severn for now.
|
|
|
|
Post by Lord Byron's Conquistadors on Sept 22, 2013 2:39:37 GMT -5
jerks lol
|
|
|
|
Post by The Sandmen on Sept 22, 2013 3:03:35 GMT -5
xx - Former Phoenix Fight Club, correct me if I am wrong, but I am pretty sure the rule saying a team MUST have 1 woman only currently applies to teams trying to rid the minimal roster requirements (more info here). We would obviously PREFER and strongly recommend everyone has a minimum of 1 woman, but unless something more recent has been posted, that requirement does not technically apply to everyone at this time. That said, Lord Byron's Conquistadors, Phoenix's advice was solid - there are lots of stellar FAs you can swap her for.
|
|
|
|
Post by xx - Former Phoenix Fight Club on Sept 22, 2013 12:36:47 GMT -5
xx - Former Phoenix Fight Club, correct me if I am wrong, but I am pretty sure the rule saying a team MUST have 1 woman only currently applies to teams trying to rid the minimal roster requirements (more info here). We would obviously PREFER and strongly recommend everyone has a minimum of 1 woman, but unless something more recent has been posted, that requirement does not technically apply to everyone at this time. There's 2 BIG glaring reasons why you are incorrect and that the wording of "We would obviously PREFER and strongly recommend everyone has a minimum of 1 woman..." is outdated and invalid. 1) I remember a conversation I had with xx - Team GAP shortly after he re-selected his new team and he indicated to me that you required him to select a women even though he really didn't want one. 2) With the women now in the GP, it's not even a question of "We would obviously PREFER and strongly recommend everyone has a minimum of 1 woman", it is, in fact, officially a requirement to have atleast 1 woman on your roster. Otherwise, your team is ineligible for the GP much like it was when folks didn't have an LW or an MW and were scrambling before the GP to acquire atleast 1. Also, to me, the rule clearly states: That reads to me like it's a requirement anyways. No?  This rule on HWs is a bit misleading aswell... The way it reads there, everyone is in violation of it because we all have more than 1 HW, yet it says there we can only have 1 "AT MOST". |
|
|
|
Post by Lord Byron's Conquistadors on Sept 22, 2013 16:11:07 GMT -5
lol rule wording debate I will check back later
|
|
|
|
Post by xx - Team GAP on Sept 22, 2013 16:35:34 GMT -5
That reads to me like it's a requirement anyways. No? This rule on HWs is a bit misleading aswell... The way it reads there, everyone is in violation of it because we all have more than 1 HW, yet it says there we can only have 1 "AT MOST". I Agree due to you firstly stating the minimums your team must have and secondly you have stated rules where you cannot trade, drop, auction, sell or anything that would drop you below these minimums. |
|
|
|
Post by The Sandmen on Sept 22, 2013 16:47:49 GMT -5
I tried to read Phoenix's quoted passage any other way, but in context, I don't think it's possible. The CONTEXT of the content is within the discussion of Minimum Roster limits. It does not say "No matter who you are, you must have ___". So yes, to redundantly clarify, those apply to teams wishing to maintain minimum rosters of 5 fighters.
|
|
This rule on HWs is a bit misleading aswell... The way it reads there, everyone is in violation of it because we all have more than 1 HW, yet it says there we can only have 1 "AT MOST". 
Have 9 points in celebration of this monumental achievement!
Jan 21, 2021 13:09:55 GMT -5
*
