|
Post by Deleted on Feb 17, 2014 20:16:31 GMT -5
I think this works well in not punishing people for anything, giving people a chance to catch up A LITTLE (but not unfairly so). I think we should try this for a bit, maybe a season, see how it pans out in practice, and maybe re-evaluate next season. Thoughts? All the other crap aside... I'm still the odd man out here. I just got my 50 posts back and now you're ripping it away from me because of some average taken from what amounts to what's generally the busiest week of the season. That does seem awfully convenient, and I'm just addressing the elephant in the room and the reason this became a discussion in the first place. I never wanted this or for it to be about me, but unfortunately, that's what it's become. I just wanted to move forward without any of this shit, but we're here now... so let's deal with it. Oh shut up Kruze. I'd be at 100 posts also Mr. "odd man out"
|
|
|
Post by xx - Former Phoenix Fight Club on Feb 17, 2014 20:25:18 GMT -5
All the other crap aside... I'm still the odd man out here. I just got my 50 posts back and now you're ripping it away from me because of some average taken from what amounts to what's generally the busiest week of the season. That does seem awfully convenient, and I'm just addressing the elephant in the room and the reason this became a discussion in the first place. I never wanted this or for it to be about me, but unfortunately, that's what it's become. I just wanted to move forward without any of this shit, but we're here now... so let's deal with it. Oh shut up Kruze. I'd be at 100 posts also Mr. "odd man out" ROFL You post more than I do and Sandman was trying to make you exempt cuz you're new... So don't gimme that shit.
|
|
|
Post by The Rocketmen on Feb 17, 2014 20:27:30 GMT -5
Stop. Everyone stop and stay on point.
|
|
|
Post by xx - Former Phoenix Fight Club on Feb 17, 2014 21:07:59 GMT -5
Stop. Everyone stop and stay on point. This coming from the guy that steered me off point in first place... Funny how that works, but ok... I'm still opposed to all of this... and even more so now due to a PM I just received from Cannon, of all people, basically confirming all my suspicions about this entire situation. lol
|
|
|
Post by The Rocketmen on Feb 17, 2014 21:43:31 GMT -5
sounds like a conspiracy situation. very nice of you to out your "friend"
|
|
|
Post by xx - Camp Cannon on Feb 17, 2014 21:48:51 GMT -5
i started this yes PHX but you do post 3x as much as me per day even if i troll you now sometimes here or there i generally stop after a certain bit but other people jump in and you continue to post more, you have 25 fighters yes i get it but its yopur choice and could drop some fighters and buy them back later to strength your team faster but still is your choice of having a bigger team i have 17 currently had 19 but dropped two and i finished in 1st place either way we can try this higher volume post per this season or we can leave it until it does become an actual issue whee your team becomes stronger then most of the teams that barely post ferocity byron myself knockout etc either way it doesn't matter to me i did get a lot of point last season 23 (mostly predictions sum posting) but barely got any the two season before that and eventually my own post rate will get to be the point where its at 100 post per point as well.. if you'd bring back ML league and posted it every tuesday thursday like the good old days when we had a sim everyday mon-fri i dont think the 100 post per point will effect you too much, you upgraded d'alelio faster with 100 points per post than i fucked up upgraded rousey with 50 point points per post..
|
|
|
Post by The West Coast Knockouts on Feb 17, 2014 21:49:00 GMT -5
Lmao it's not a conspiracy. Kruze stop watching the illuminati videos on YouTube lol but let's put Rocketmens suggestion in a poll and end this.
|
|
|
Post by The Rocketmen on Feb 17, 2014 22:00:43 GMT -5
My suggestion originally was proposed by Lizard people. Let's give it a try.
|
|
|
Post by xx - Team GAP on Feb 17, 2014 22:20:21 GMT -5
25 posts per point = 2.99 or lower posts per day avg. 50 posts per point = 3.0 to 9.99 posts per day avg. 100 posts per point = 10.01 and higher posts per day avg. Thoughts? so i assume then Sandmen will be at 150 posts per point then... since it is 100 posts per point based on this plus 50 posts for being staff. I don't like this idea at all. if you don't post then you shouldn't be rewarded for not posting. if you don't post, you probably should post more... that is what really solves this issue
|
|
|
Post by xx - Camp Cannon on Feb 17, 2014 22:31:34 GMT -5
it wont be i suggested 75 points and sandmen siad it would be too hard to keep track of
|
|
|
Post by xx - Former Phoenix Fight Club on Feb 17, 2014 22:41:36 GMT -5
i started this yes PHX but you do post 3x as much as me per day even if i troll you now sometimes here or there i generally stop after a certain bit but other people jump in and you continue to post more, you have 25 fighters yes i get it but its yopur choice and could drop some fighters and buy them back later to strength your team faster but still is your choice of having a bigger team i have 17 currently had 19 but dropped two and i finished in 1st place either way we can try this higher volume post per this season or we can leave it until it does become an actual issue whee your team becomes stronger then most of the teams that barely post ferocity byron myself knockout etc either way it doesn't matter to me i did get a lot of point last season 23 (mostly predictions sum posting) but barely got any the two season before that and eventually my own post rate will get to be the point where its at 100 post per point as well.. if you'd bring back ML league and posted it every tuesday thursday like the good old days when we had a sim everyday mon-fri i dont think the 100 post per point will effect you too much, you upgraded d'alelio faster with 100 points per post than i fucked up upgraded rousey with 50 point points per post.. 1) It's not your place, or anyone else's, to decide how good or how bad anyone's team should be; this isn't the WWE. 2) Just as it's my choice to post as much as I do and carry the roster size that I do because I post allot, so too is it your choice to post as much as you do and have the roster you do. 3) You're the last person who should be talking about "the good ol'days of ML" since you were even less active than Byron was in the ML. You didn't give a shit about then, so don't act like you give a shit now just cuz it suits your purposes. 4) As I said before, about 90% of D'Alleio's points came from when I was at 50 posts, but that was also when I had a smaller roster than I have now. The reason I finished it off was cuz I wanted to, and the thing is that she's not quite as complete as I wanted her to be, even though she's capped, but she's damn close. In any event, I can already see that this is likely one of those things that I can do nothing about cuz everyone's playing Vince McMahon on this. So do what you will... I just hope that you actually let me run with this to either prove or disprove my theory that my larger roster actually does even out the point scale instead of living in fear that I'm somehow going to be a powerhouse. I personally don't see that happening for atleast 2 seasons from now and that is directly because of the 100 posts/point I was on last season and didn't allow me to progress with everyone else and I remained in 10th, no matter what any of you think about what I did with D'Alelio, although that was a small part of it too.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 17, 2014 22:50:58 GMT -5
Oh shut up Kruze. I'd be at 100 posts also Mr. "odd man out" ROFL You post more than I do and Sandman was trying to make you exempt cuz you're new... So don't gimme that shit. That's why I offered to go at 100 posts/point. Stop your bitchin' and take it like a man oh wait..........
|
|
|
Post by The West Coast Knockouts on Feb 17, 2014 22:52:05 GMT -5
25 posts per point = 2.99 or lower posts per day avg. 50 posts per point = 3.0 to 9.99 posts per day avg. 100 posts per point = 10.01 and higher posts per day avg. Thoughts? so i assume then Sandmen will be at 150 posts per point then... since it is 100 posts per point based on this plus 50 posts for being staff. I don't like this idea at all. if you don't post then you shouldn't be rewarded for not posting. if you don't post, you probably should post more... that is what really solves this issue Stop creating more problems lol it clearly says "100 posts per point = 10.01 and higher posts per day avg".
|
|
|
Post by The Sandmen on Feb 17, 2014 23:50:19 GMT -5
Verdict 25 posts per point = 2.99 or lower posts per day avg. 50 posts per point = 3.0 to 9.99 posts per day avg. 75 posts per point = 10.00 and higher posts per day avg. 100 posts per point for Sandman. We'll go with this for this season, and review it next season. We're never going to be able to make everyone happy, so those unhappy few, take the season and try to think of something that works best for everyone next season. If this goes well, and people catch up to a decent point, we can look at 50s across the board again or something. We'll see how it goes. But looking at the make-up of teams, etc I think we do need this tweak. The way I see this, it benefits everyone. The lowest get more incentive to catch up, (since they only have to post 25 times to get a point), the highest still get their advantage from posting (since they still earn more points than the others) and the average people are unchanged.
|
|
|
Post by xx - Team GAP on Feb 18, 2014 2:01:46 GMT -5
Verdict I find you guilty!! Sandmen, you have been found guilty of being biased and very deliberately trying to screw people over. You will now be sentenced to having to do 150 posts per point (100 per what you suggested and +50 for the posts you have to make for simming) this will be carried out immediately.. any refusal to do this only proves your guilt and it proves that you are trying to not be fair and you are only looking to abuse the system for yourself. My activity on the site will now drop because now I don't have to post as much to make the same number of posts. THIS IS WRONG!! THIS SHOULD NOT BE HAPPENING!!
|
|