|
|
Post by The Sandmen on Feb 18, 2014 2:39:07 GMT -5
My activity on the site will now drop because now I don't have to post as much to make the same number of posts. If you read what was happening, you'd see this doesn't affect you or your points per posts at all. If you feel the desire to be less active, you are only hurting yourself, and you are free to do that. Carry on. (Also, using threats of inactivity is a form of bullying to try to get your way, and won't get you much sympathy from me) |
|
|
|
Post by xx - Team GAP on Feb 18, 2014 2:52:42 GMT -5
My activity on the site will now drop because now I don't have to post as much to make the same number of posts. If you read what was happening, you'd see this doesn't affect you or your points per posts at all. If you feel the desire to be less active, you are only hurting yourself, and you are free to do that. Carry on. (Also, using threats of inactivity is a form of bullying to try to get your way, and won't get you much sympathy from me) IF ANYONE IS A BULLY HERE IT IS YOU, SANDMEN!! I have read what is happening here and I am only adhereing to the rules you set out. I would much prefer to receive 25 posts per point.. so I will post less. I would suggest others to do the same. Then nobody will post and you can own a dead site. Is that really what you want? FACT: People shoulod not be hindered for posting. when the name of the game is post and get rewarded. If people post less they should post more then they will see improvement. I also don't see how it's fair that you are the simmer and what you have set up here does not affect your posts per point ratio at all.. You should by all accounts be at 150 posts per point because you have stated that you have a higher post per point ratio simply because you are a simmer. but what you have set up here you will be at 100 posts per point which is the same as some regular players on this site... THAT IS NOT RIGHT!! C'mon man.. start doing the right thing. |
|
|
|
Post by The Sandmen on Feb 18, 2014 2:55:35 GMT -5
You understand the averages are based on since you joined up right? For you to get down to under 3 posts per day, you would essentially need to post nothing at all for about 4 months (in which time you would obviously be stripped of your team for inactivity so others who actually want to be on the site can have your fighters? The fact that you keep spewing that out as a viable strategy to cheat the system just brings your own ignorance to the forefront of this discussion.
Do what you wish. This attitude takes all the fun out of it anyways, so I will gladly have a dead site, rather than one filled with these childish bullying tactics.
|
|
|
|
Post by xx - Team GAP on Feb 18, 2014 3:06:24 GMT -5
So now you threaten to take my team away from me... really? I'm now going to be inactive because i post 2 times a day? Then strip rebel storm of their team, strip west coast knockout of their team. because they have been just about as inactive as I would be. Really pay attention to what I'm saying. think about what i'm saying instead of assuming i'm the "bad guy" "I'm the bully" start looking at what i'm really saying.. I think this is wrong for the site. If anything I'm trying to be the good guy here. but you don't seem to understand reason when it is opposed to your opinions of greed and power.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Sandmen on Feb 18, 2014 3:11:02 GMT -5
You clearly do not want to be here. They do. That's the difference. I have explained the new system to you in detail, both publicly and privately. If you do not like it and do not wish to be here, I will accept your resignation here. |
|
|
|
Post by xx - Team GAP on Feb 18, 2014 3:39:29 GMT -5
I will think about it. (I mean since your practically pushing me out the door)
|
|
|
|
Post by xx - Team GAP on Feb 18, 2014 3:54:30 GMT -5
ya I bet you liked my comment..
|
|
|
|
Post by The Sandmen on Feb 18, 2014 4:10:35 GMT -5
I like when people think.
|
|
|
|
Post by xx - Team GAP on Feb 18, 2014 4:50:25 GMT -5
then why don't you do it?
|
|
|
|
Post by The Sandmen on Feb 18, 2014 5:31:54 GMT -5
It's all I ever do, which is why you are in a constant state of confusion and misunderstanding.
|
|
|
|
Post by Lord Byron's Conquistadors on Feb 18, 2014 6:30:34 GMT -5
Bulldozers did not get 1 point every 25 posts. He has been at 1 for 50 since he signed up. And as I have said on other sites, it's not always about "being the best". It's about options. When you have more points, you have more options. You can choose to have a team of 25. That option is available to you, but it is not available to Knockouts. This proposed suggestion does not hurt high-posters (as I said above - they still get many more points due to posting). As The West Coast Knockouts said, 100 posts is easy to come by for heavy posters. I agree with him, and these stats not only show that but they also show that you still have the much-earned advantage by BEING a heavy poster, compared to a light poster. You still get that edge, it's just not so uneven and daunting for the slower posters to compete. I disagree completely. I was at 100 posts and it did hurt my team immensely. I really don't expect you to understand because you're the simmer and get you 100 posts extremely easy because of that. I don't get any edge because I don't get ahead at all. I'm always at the bottom of the standings. Honestly, what my biggest problem with most of you that are complaining about my post volumes and not being able to catch up, (the xx - Camp Cannon's, the Lord Byron's Conquistadors, The West Coast Knockouts of the league.) is that what you're all failing to realize is that ALL OF YOU are ALWAYS ahead of me in the standings nearly every season and have no real reason to be complaining at all. Look, it was because you folks started complaining early on that I was posting more and accumulating more points than most of you, that I built my roster to a size of 20 (now 24) so that I had to spread out the points I was making at 50 posts/point more thinly to level the playing field out, and even that wasn't good enough for you; Cannon was even bitching about my roster size not thinking that me having a larger roster would even out with the amount of points I was generating. Then I moved up to 100 posts cuz I was staff and was having a difficult time even just barely staying afloat at that level. But now I've gotta deal with this shit again because I've gone back down to 50 posts/point and suddenly the world is ending. All I'm honestly seeing here is that you're all causing problems for me, moreso because you don't like me than it is because of my actual post volumes being unfair. That's pretty sad cuz I hear all this crap about not being able to catch up but all these teams that are saying that are always at or near the top of the standings, minus Byron. This is simply a play to keep themselves at the top and to keep me at the bottom. It's pathetic. i was tagged here donno why cause i didn do nothin man. i didn say a word. i think i asked before not to be included in fightin but if i didn i ask here to please don tag me or include me in fightin. |
|
|
|
Post by The West Coast Knockouts on Feb 18, 2014 9:00:41 GMT -5
*shakes head* the cheese lmao
|
|
|
|
Post by xx - Former Phoenix Fight Club on Feb 18, 2014 23:30:12 GMT -5
If you read what was happening, you'd see this doesn't affect you or your points per posts at all. If you feel the desire to be less active, you are only hurting yourself, and you are free to do that. Carry on. (Also, using threats of inactivity is a form of bullying to try to get your way, and won't get you much sympathy from me) IF ANYONE IS A BULLY HERE IT IS YOU, SANDMEN!! I have read what is happening here and I am only adhereing to the rules you set out. I would much prefer to receive 25 posts per point.. so I will post less. I would suggest others to do the same. Then nobody will post and you can own a dead site. Is that really what you want? FACT: People shoulod not be hindered for posting. when the name of the game is post and get rewarded. If people post less they should post more then they will see improvement. I also don't see how it's fair that you are the simmer and what you have set up here does not affect your posts per point ratio at all.. You should by all accounts be at 150 posts per point because you have stated that you have a higher post per point ratio simply because you are a simmer. but what you have set up here you will be at 100 posts per point which is the same as some regular players on this site... THAT IS NOT RIGHT!! C'mon man.. start doing the right thing. LOL And so ends the ride of the 4 Horsemen...  GAP's 100% Correct though. |
|
|
|
Post by The Rocketmen on Feb 18, 2014 23:38:11 GMT -5
LOL
|
|
|
|
Post by The Sandmen on Feb 18, 2014 23:38:47 GMT -5
Luckily the league is a democracy, and the majority are happy with the change, so whether you think GAP is correct or not, the majority has spoken.
+1 Majority
-1 Kruztatorship and bullying to get your way.
|
|
Have 9 points in celebration of this monumental achievement!