|
|
Post by xx - Former Phoenix Fight Club on Oct 28, 2014 20:15:44 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 28, 2014 20:18:04 GMT -5
Yup
|
|
|
|
Post by The Sandmen on Oct 28, 2014 20:21:50 GMT -5
I'm going to need The Rocketmen to accept this trade. Bulldozers had publicly posted he had taken points with those picks. The trade that was accepted, approved, and finalized says "6 points now, and 6 as acquired". When that trade was posted, accepted, and finalized, those "as acquired" points were published as drafted points, thus committed to Rocketmen. We'll see what he says. |
|
|
|
Post by xx - Former Phoenix Fight Club on Oct 28, 2014 20:28:57 GMT -5
I'm going to need The Rocketmen to accept this trade. Bulldozers had publicly posted he had taken points with those picks. The trade that was accepted, approved, and finalized says "6 points now, and 6 as acquired". When that trade was posted, accepted, and finalized, those "as acquired" points were published as drafted points, thus committed to Rocketmen. We'll see what he says. That alleged "trade" should be null and void Justin as per your decree previously on my deal with GAP. Quit with your bias bullshit. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 28, 2014 20:30:32 GMT -5
Fuck it, nevermind then.
|
|
|
|
Post by xx - Former Phoenix Fight Club on Oct 28, 2014 20:37:15 GMT -5
You know what? Fuck you, you little turd... you accepted. Deal with it. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 28, 2014 20:46:26 GMT -5
Wtf? Kruze act your fucking age. Jeez you're almost 40 but you act younger than me.
|
|
|
|
Post by xx - Former Phoenix Fight Club on Oct 28, 2014 20:57:50 GMT -5
Wtf? Kruze act your fucking age. Jeez you're almost 40 but you act younger than me. Coming from the kid that believes his deal for a favor is perfectly legit, yet other deals for a favor are not cuz he's not involved.  I'm going to need The Rocketmen to accept this trade. Bulldozers had publicly posted he had taken points with those picks. The trade that was accepted, approved, and finalized says "6 points now, and 6 as acquired". When that trade was posted, accepted, and finalized, those "as acquired" points were published as drafted points, thus committed to Rocketmen. We'll see what he says. As for this shit, no draft points have been added to the points thread nor is the draft live yet. This is a completely separate deal. Mike should've specified draft picks as well not just points. This deal should be perfectly fine. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 28, 2014 20:59:22 GMT -5
Wasn't a deal for a favour.
|
|
|
|
Post by xx - Former Phoenix Fight Club on Oct 28, 2014 21:02:34 GMT -5
Wasn't a deal for a favour. Charity isn't a favor?  Really? Do you even think before you speak? |
|
|
|
Post by The Rocketmen on Oct 28, 2014 21:05:40 GMT -5
I like that everyone criticizes Bulldozers for charity, then he does some charity back almost like a lay-away trade on Coleman, and now everyone hates on him for charity....
so...
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 28, 2014 21:06:24 GMT -5
Wasn't a deal for a favour. Charity isn't a favor? Really? Do you even think before you speak? Ok let's put this into accounting words. Mike have me an asset for something that would be paid back in the future. So I gained an asset but I had a liability with having to pay back Mike for the asset. I have now paid back my liability making Coleman my full asset and not just somebody I got for free. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 28, 2014 21:07:29 GMT -5
I like that everyone criticizes Bulldozers for charity, then he does some charity back almost like a lay-away trade on Coleman, and now everyone hates on him for charity.... so... You can reject this if you want I won't care. |
|
|
|
Post by xx - Former Phoenix Fight Club on Oct 28, 2014 21:10:31 GMT -5
I like that everyone criticizes Bulldozers for charity, then he does some charity back almost like a lay-away trade on Coleman, and now everyone hates on him for charity.... so... It wasn't specified in the original deal that it was "lay-away" Mike. It was a straight up 3 fighters for 2 discounted price as charity on your part.... no future considerations, nothing. It was a favor to Dozers that you did of your own volition. Points for nothing shouldn't be allowed based on the outright rejection of my GAP deal that was also for a favor. What's decreed should be universal not on a case by case basis. That's not fair to the league. Charity isn't a favor? Really? Do you even think before you speak? Ok let's put this into accounting words. Mike have me an asset for something that would be paid back in the future. So I gained an asset but I had a liability with having to pay back Mike for the asset. I have now paid back my liability making Coleman my full asset and not just somebody I got for free. As I said above, it was a straight up 3 for 2 deal you made. No mention of future considerations or any liability, lien or anything owed to Mike later. |
|
|
|
Post by The Rocketmen on Oct 28, 2014 21:13:35 GMT -5
We're going to discuss fairness to the league? lol
|
|
Really? Do you even think before you speak?
Have 9 points in celebration of this monumental achievement!