|
Post by xx - Former Bulldozers on Nov 7, 2016 11:14:39 GMT -5
I feel like the odds system isn't clearly explained... the way you've explained them before is taking into account the original bet in the payout So a 1 to 1 literally says "Give me 2 points and if you're correct, you'll get your two points back." Where as the 2:1 odds says "give me 2 points and if you're correct, I'll give you your 2 points back plus 2 more." And the 1:2 odds (supposed to be worse than the 1 to 1) says "give me 2 points and I will give you your 2 points back plus 1 more." So, technically, you are giving more points out for the 1:2 odds than the 1 to 1 (quite literally, as The Sandmen suggested, a completely useless one to bet on). 1:2 you get 3 points (the two you bet plus an additional 1). 1:1 you get 4 points (the two you bet plus an additional 2). 2:1 you get 6 points (the two you bet plus an additional 4).
|
|
|
Post by xx - The Broad Street Bullies on Nov 7, 2016 11:57:59 GMT -5
I feel like the odds system isn't clearly explained... the way you've explained them before is taking into account the original bet in the payout So a 1 to 1 literally says "Give me 2 points and if you're correct, you'll get your two points back." Where as the 2:1 odds says "give me 2 points and if you're correct, I'll give you your 2 points back plus 2 more." And the 1:2 odds (supposed to be worse than the 1 to 1) says "give me 2 points and I will give you your 2 points back plus 1 more." So, technically, you are giving more points out for the 1:2 odds than the 1 to 1 (quite literally, as The Sandmen suggested, a completely useless one to bet on). 1:2 you get 3 points ( the two you bet plus an additional 1). 1:1 you get 4 points (the two you bet plus an additional 2). 2:1 you get 6 points (the two you bet plus an additional 6). What he said
|
|
|
Post by The Mighty Ducks on Nov 7, 2016 20:25:00 GMT -5
lol oh cocketdicks... what a fucking tool...
|
|
|
Post by The Texas Rattlesnakes on Nov 7, 2016 22:40:37 GMT -5
lol oh cocketdicks... what a fucking tool... I don't know why, but this comment made me laugh really hard and I choked on my fruity pebbles.
|
|
|
Post by The Rocketmen on Nov 7, 2016 22:51:52 GMT -5
thanks for the support!
|
|
|
Post by xx - Former Phoenix Fight Club on Nov 7, 2016 22:55:02 GMT -5
I'll put 2 points on GAP to win it all.
|
|
|
Post by xx - Former Phoenix Fight Club on Nov 7, 2016 23:02:40 GMT -5
I feel like the odds system isn't clearly explained... the way you've explained them before is taking into account the original bet in the payout So a 1 to 1 literally says "Give me 2 points and if you're correct, you'll get your two points back." Where as the 2:1 odds says "give me 2 points and if you're correct, I'll give you your 2 points back plus 2 more." And the 1:2 odds (supposed to be worse than the 1 to 1) says "give me 2 points and I will give you your 2 points back plus 1 more." So, technically, you are giving more points out for the 1:2 odds than the 1 to 1 (quite literally, as The Sandmen suggested, a completely useless one to bet on). 1:2 you get 3 points (the two you bet plus an additional 1). 1:1 you get 4 points (the two you bet plus an additional 2). 2:1 you get 6 points (the two you bet plus an additional 4). Should be the other way around...The least likely to win should pay more, not the most likely...
|
|
|
Post by xx - Former Bulldozers on Nov 7, 2016 23:15:45 GMT -5
1:2 you get 3 points (the two you bet plus an additional 1). 1:1 you get 4 points (the two you bet plus an additional 2). 2:1 you get 6 points (the two you bet plus an additional 4). Should be the other way around...The least likely to win should pay more, not the most likely... 1:2 is Sandmen and Knockouts who are the most likely to win lol.
|
|
|
Post by xx - Former Phoenix Fight Club on Nov 8, 2016 2:44:44 GMT -5
Should be the other way around...The least likely to win should pay more, not the most likely... 1:2 is Sandmen and Knockouts who are the most likely to win lol. Then it's fine lol I still put 2 points on GAP to win it all.
|
|
|
Post by The Mighty Ducks on Nov 9, 2016 10:26:06 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by The Rocketmen on Nov 13, 2016 23:16:00 GMT -5
lol PROCESSED
|
|