|
|
Post by The Texas Rattlesnakes on Nov 23, 2016 9:20:13 GMT -5
So, we have a superfight title that literally any male fight can challenge/fight for. . . So why not have the same thing for the female fighter division? I don't like my proposed name, but I definitely think there should be a female superfight title. It would spice things up a bit and would be cool for the female division.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Sandmen on Nov 23, 2016 9:44:24 GMT -5
This is a suggestion and should probably be in the suggestion box, rather than your column. Unless you are not serious and just sort of venting your thoughts.
There are many rather simple answers to that question:
1) Until a few seasons ago, we only had 1 women's division. So for about 15 seasons, the women's title basically was a women's Superfight title.
2) Now that we have 2 women's divisions, each division is pretty shallow (both in bodies and in skill). We have about 10 less women in each weight class than we do men, and we only have 2 women divisions compared to 3 men's divisions. So the numbers don;t really necessitate another belt.
3) Touched on in 2, the depth of skill isn't there. The best women should be fighting for the real belts, and since FLyweight was created as a sort of consolation prize for the smaller women who could not compete with Cyborg, Carano, and Kaufman, it's only now starting to flesh out a little bit. But even then, we have a dominant FW champion. So I would rather people focus on trying to beat that champion than a whole new challenge belt.
4) We have too few challengers for the SF belt as it is, let alone adding another women's catagory.
5) My champion banner is too big as it is.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Texas Rattlesnakes on Nov 23, 2016 10:21:48 GMT -5
Welp. . . all that shit makes sense.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Sandmen on Nov 23, 2016 10:38:45 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by The Mighty Ducks on Nov 23, 2016 10:39:43 GMT -5
let's make a board about the vegas team
|
|
Have 9 points in celebration of this monumental achievement!