|
Post by The Sandmen on Mar 26, 2017 20:55:28 GMT -5
Every once in a while, I float the idea of having roster caps (i.e. a maximum number of fighters you can have on your team).
I ran it by a couple different people recently, and they all seemed to be on board, so I figured I would mention it here again.
Because a roster cap is more about booking and league numbers than it is about there being an inherent problem with people locking up fighters or anything like that, I was thinking about doing something along the lines of a formula.
Something like this:
League cap = 30 - (# of league members).
Therefore, right now, we would have a roster cap of 16. If someone resigned, roster cap would go up to 17. If we got a new member, cap would go down to 15. That sort of thing. I don't think I would ever go below 15 though - 3 fighters per weight class always seemed and felt like a perfect ideal to me.
Anyways, this is being posted right now as both a very tentative warning, as well as a "thinking out loud", and I am sure a heated argument will break out. If we do bring in roster limits, you will have time to do things, or make trades, or what have you. Further, I don't think I'm going to make any concrete decisions on it until I see how the draft and auctions pan out.
We'll see.
|
|
|
Post by The Texas Rattlesnakes on Mar 26, 2017 21:13:00 GMT -5
All for it.
|
|
|
Post by xx - The Underdog Regime on Mar 26, 2017 21:15:21 GMT -5
Just limit Kruze's roster, and we'll bet set for future seasons.
You know I'm just messing with you, Kruzey baby.
|
|
|
Post by The Texas Rattlesnakes on Mar 26, 2017 21:24:31 GMT -5
Just limit Kruze's roster, and we'll bet set for future seasons. You know I'm just messing with you, Kruzey baby. You don't talk much... but when you do... I feel like it's hilarious.
|
|
|
Post by Lord Byron's Conquistadors on Mar 27, 2017 3:25:55 GMT -5
would this include limits in each weight class too like 3 or 4 per?
|
|
|
Post by xx - Camp Cannon on Mar 27, 2017 5:16:25 GMT -5
u just want my girls nbro i say no limit allowed
|
|
|
Post by The Sandmen on Mar 27, 2017 5:50:14 GMT -5
would this include limits in each weight class too like 3 or 4 per? I would like this, but I think a lot of people would be annoyed. But we have some teams with as many as 6 heavyweights. That's pretty excessive. But the thing is, there are several people here who give absolutely no shits about female fighters, for example, and others who love them. So it doesn't really make a lot of sense to limit those who like them somewhat arbitrarily. Things would be different if I thought people wanted some fighters (women for example) but all the good ones were locked up on one or two teams. I have not heard that complaint at all yet, to be honest. Yes, there is an imbalance of what teams have women (I would not be surprised if Cannon and Phoenix combined for 50% of the league's female fighters). But if that is what they like having on their team, and no one else cares, more power to them. Big takeaway - I have not heard people say "I would have more female fighters, but (blank) has them all locked up on his team". But I have heard people say, "I have no interest in women."
|
|
|
Post by The Mighty Ducks on Mar 27, 2017 10:39:59 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by xx - Former Phoenix Fight Club on Mar 27, 2017 11:15:10 GMT -5
What? I have no real issue with 3-4 per weightclass... Only one I have excess of that right now is in BW, and, from the sounds of it, the women aren't going to be affected anyways. I've also got 18 fighters total... So nothing here is a huge hardship. You seem to forget how much downsizing I've actually done over the last 3-4 seasons. I do find it interesting, however, that suddenly this is some sort of an "issue" again with Ferocity downsizing yet we just added 2 new teams; so effectively 1 team with the loss of Ferocity in GP contention. I'm personally not seeing it as much of an issue at the moment, but I also don't disagree Sandman's previous statement in response to Byron about the 3-4 per weightclass idea either.
|
|
|
Post by The Rocketmen on Mar 27, 2017 11:21:29 GMT -5
I like that you gathered all of those assumptions by getting tagged in a thread. That amuses me.
|
|
|
Post by Lord Byron's Conquistadors on Mar 27, 2017 11:23:10 GMT -5
hes salty today
|
|
|
Post by Lord Byron's Conquistadors on Mar 27, 2017 11:25:05 GMT -5
I think I'm ok with 4 per weight class maybe I would pick up another woman if phx or cannon let one go.
|
|
|
Post by xx - Former Phoenix Fight Club on Mar 27, 2017 11:52:41 GMT -5
I like that you gathered all of those assumptions by getting tagged in a thread. That amuses me. What assumptions would those be exactly? I got tagged in this thread cuz Ducks was trying to troll me figuring I'd have a problem with a roster limit, and I don't. It was a troll that backfired 😂
|
|
|
Post by The Texas Rattlesnakes on Mar 27, 2017 11:53:40 GMT -5
I like that you gathered all of those assumptions by getting tagged in a thread. That amuses me. What assumptions would those be exactly? I got tagged in this thread cuz Ducks was trying to troll me figuring I'd have a problem with a roster limit, and I don't. It was a troll that backfired 😂 Jesus, Are they fucking assholes or what!?
|
|
|
Post by The Sandmen on Mar 27, 2017 11:59:39 GMT -5
SNAFU!
|
|