|
|
Post by xx - Camp Cannon on Oct 29, 2018 20:17:16 GMT -5
i think alll of this is fucking dumb
|
|
|
|
Post by xx - Camp Cannon on Oct 28, 2018 17:54:27 GMT -5
probably over 200 since its a popularity contest So is the men's, to a point, but even our consensus isn't perfect.. lol obviously your consesus doesnt matter based on your roster and claiming rousey to be a b falling into The Sandmen trap of we cant letter grade woman "because" and having carano n zingano be the best when they dont deserve to be |
|
|
|
Post by xx - Camp Cannon on Oct 27, 2018 16:14:47 GMT -5
And this is why we don't have women letter-grades. If you guys find a decent, third-party ranked list of the best female pound for pound fighters of all time, we can start looking at it. The only one I found consisted of 3 fan voters. The one we originally used for men had 200 voters. probably over 200 since its a popularity contest |
|
|
|
Post by xx - Camp Cannon on Oct 26, 2018 18:04:54 GMT -5
and im talking about the letter grade rankings where julie kedzie should be an f to rousey a Fair enough... No one else was. lol 😜 But if you do wanna get into that, I'd give Rousey a mid-low B, at best... only because of her win streak due to opponents going too aggro on her to start fights... Or Ronda cheated. 😉 lol Rousey was a one trick pony that was finally exploited though. Sort of the same with Carano too... She only started getting decent on the ground just before she retired. Both were deadly at one thing though... No argument there. Kedzie would likely be a mid-high C. Her only championship came @ Jackson, granted, but she was always at forefront of women's MMA right from the start. The only real true "A's" in women's MMA for our purposes are really Nakai & Tate and maybe JJ & Holm... But even the latter two have their cracks. It's still too early in the women's MMA evolution to draw a definitive line. a mid low b eh for 1st womans champ hllo of famer and 9 defences who also beat zigano in 18 seconds i say she higher than an a unlike kedzie and carano |
|
|
|
Post by xx - Camp Cannon on Oct 25, 2018 21:45:21 GMT -5
As I have said many times, after you put about 5-6 points into your fighter, that overrides any build I make for them. But even forgetting that, with the ability to subtract points, your argument that "my speculations" are somehow affecting someone's build, for bettor or worse, is moot as fuck. hardly theres only 20 points to be put into said fighter(s) |
|
|
|
Post by xx - Camp Cannon on Oct 25, 2018 20:53:24 GMT -5
@tleast the managers league was fair you got too assign your points from scrap and wasnt based on someone speculations
|
|
|
|
Post by xx - Camp Cannon on Oct 25, 2018 20:50:48 GMT -5
ok so the a system ranking was brought here for realism so an e cant win the belt or be as good as anderson silva, thus sandmen created fighters out of his best estimations and these supposedly a ranking are sucking cuz they were built probably too well rounded thus sandmen gives us 2 points a week to fix his mistakes are you saying we should get more points or get rid of the a - e ranking system?  great so your saying i should spend 30 points on a fighter sandmen messed up and 4 lord anderson silva and gina carano(dunno how) to be the best? |
|
|
|
Post by xx - Camp Cannon on Oct 25, 2018 20:45:05 GMT -5
I really don't mean to be rude when I say this... but could the less smart people STOP fucking referring to Letter Grades as the Rankings?! ok so the a system ranking was brought here for realism so an e cant win the belt or be as good as anderson silva, thus sandmen created fighters out of his best estimations and these supposedly a ranking are sucking cuz they were built probably too well rounded thus sandmen gives us 2 points a week to fix his mistakes are you saying we should get more points or get rid of the a - e ranking system? |
|
|
|
Post by xx - Camp Cannon on Oct 25, 2018 20:39:22 GMT -5
I didn't ask... So no... You didn't clear anything up at all. I do find them to be very name weighted, regardless of what you claim to the contrary. Of course you would not ask, nor listen to people who actually know things. It would shake the foundation of your, "But I live in my own special world and no one else can come in" bubble. Carry on. (Predicted reply from PHX: "No, you!" And since I have now posted that, an alternative will now be, "You assume, and are wrong as usual". And now, PHX is officially out of replies. #CheckmateBitches) that's the only check mate you can actually earn kudos 2 you |
|
|
|
Post by xx - Camp Cannon on Oct 25, 2018 20:38:02 GMT -5
I really don't mean to be rude when I say this... but could the less smart people STOP fucking referring to Letter Grades as the Rankings?! im all for letter gradings for womens so gina carano and julie kedzie arent beating rousey |
|
|
|
Post by xx - Camp Cannon on Oct 25, 2018 18:29:57 GMT -5
yes ranker.com or w/e sites called is actually a name wise popularity poll in which this site copues and assigns a letter class rankingg here which would mak e xx - Former Phoenix Fight Club correct in a way |
|
|
|
Post by xx - Camp Cannon on Oct 25, 2018 18:26:05 GMT -5
what the fuck r u talking about the mens is a name popularity poll on ranker.com or w/e the sites called That's for upgrading purposes, Normand... lol What we're talking about are the actual ManMMA site rankings... You know... The little numbers in front of some fighters on our cards?! 😜 and im talking about the letter grade rankings where julie kedzie should be an f to rousey a |
|
|
|
Post by xx - Camp Cannon on Oct 24, 2018 18:31:01 GMT -5
if there a name raanking system 4 men why not womens only seems about right There isn't names ranking for either men's or women's... It just seems like it cuz mostly the same fighters are in there all the time. It's rare to see anyone different, unfortunately. what the fuck r u talking about the mens is a name popularity poll on ranker.com or w/e the sites called |
|
|
|
Post by xx - Camp Cannon on Oct 24, 2018 18:13:33 GMT -5
if there a name raanking system 4 men why not womens only seems about right
|
|
|
|
Post by xx - Camp Cannon on Oct 24, 2018 18:12:59 GMT -5
I don't do the rankings personally, but I get updates on how they are updated. Names play absolutely no part, since, during the season, it's 100% about who you beat (and where that person was ranked). Off-season, people's positions usually get a review, and if someone is on a major winning streak they might get pushed up over someone who is on a major losing streak. In-season (and definitely by this point of the season), your ranking means you beat someone of that ranking to earn the ranking you have. hope that clarified things for you some.  I didn't ask... So no... You didn't clear anything up at all. I do find them to be very name weighted, regardless of what you claim to the contrary. they should be name rated too rousey hom an a and carano maybe a c and julie whatever her no name face is an f thus nno chance of beating rousey and holm irl on here its suppose 2 be realistic |
|
x8 
Have 9 points in celebration of this monumental achievement!
Jan 21, 2021 13:09:55 GMT -5
*
