|
Post by The Sandmen on Mar 1, 2013 19:59:22 GMT -5
March 1, 2013 SkyDomeToronto, ONEvent ResultsHeavyweight Championship Mirko Cro Cop (17-11) vs. Lyoto Machida (23-6)Winner is Lyoto Machida by KO (High kick) at 0:38 Round 5 Middleweight Championship Thiago Alves (15-3) vs. Paul Daley (4-0)Winner is Thiago Alves by TKO (Punches) at 3:24 Round 2 Lightweight Championship Benson Henderson (21-5) vs. Diego Sanchez (15-9)Winner is Diego Sanchez by Submission (Armbar) at 4:26 Round 5 Women's Championship Cris Cyborg (20-3) vs, Gina Carano (21-3) IIIWinner is Cris Cyborg by KO (Elbow) at 4:19 Round 1 Heavyweight #1 Contender Bout Anderson Silva (30-4) vs. Kimbo Slice (19-5)Winner is Anderson Silva by Submission (Armbar) at 4:45 Round 1 Women's #1 Contender Bout Sarah Kaufman (19-5) vs. Naho Sugiyama (3-0)Winner is Sarah Kaufman by KO (GnP) at 1:47 Round 1 Middleweight Bout Georges St-Pierre (26-10-1) vs. Rich Franklin (16-12)Winner is Georges St-Pierre by Submission (armbar) at 2:59 Round 3 Heavyweight Bout Forrest Griffin (17-9) vs. Dave Herman (3-0)Winner is Forrest Griffin by KO (Elbows) at 2:39 Round 2 Middleweight Bout Patrick Cote (3-0) vs. Cung Le (16-9)Winner is Cung Le by Submission (Armbar) at 1:52 Round 5 Heavyweight Bout Alistair Overeem (18-12) vs. Rampage Jackson (18-14)Winner is Alistair Overeem by KO (Punches) at 0:42 Round 4 Heavyweight Bout Brock Lesnar (14-13) vs. Junior Dos Santos (22-9) IVWinner is Junior dos Santos by TKO (GnP) at 3:34 Round 1 Lightweight Bout Melvin Guillard (13-6) vs. Shinya Aoki (17-15) IIIWinner is Melvin Guillard by KO (Strikes from guard) at 2:12 Round 1 Middleweight Bout Carlos Condit (16-11) vs. Dan Henderson (17-13-1)Winner is Dan Henderson by Technical Submission (Rear Naked Choke) at 3:35 Round 4 Lightweight Bout Dominick Cruz (16-8) vs. Clay Guida (14-10)Winner is Dominick Cruz by KO (Punch) at 0:22 Round 4 "Loser's Fired" Lightweight Bout Michael Chandler (7-9) vs. Kenny Florian (3-9)Winner is Kenny Florian by Submission (Triangle) at 2:14 Round 2 Women's Bout Ronda Rousey (9-10) vs. Alexis Davis (12-10)Winner is Ronda Rousey by Submission (Armbar) at 2:30 Round 1 BonusesFight of the Night: Overeem vs. Rampage KO of the Night: Lyoto Machida & Melvin Guillard Submission of the Night: Kenny Florian & Dan Henderson StatisticsAttendance: 55,000 (100%) Buy Rate: 2,741,792
|
|
|
Post by The Sandmen on Mar 1, 2013 20:11:45 GMT -5
Cannon 13/16
Underdogs 8/16
Ferocity 10/16
PHX 7/16
Hammerfists 13/16
Sandmen 11/16
GrappleMuch 9/16
+1 Cannon/HummerTits
(also, Mike if you are using this as a point guide, +1 Sandmen for losing Chandler)
|
|
|
Post by xx - Former Phoenix Fight Club on Mar 1, 2013 20:45:30 GMT -5
I really don't think you should be getting a point for Chandler, Sandman, considering the new rule where folks have to cut "neglected" fighters and receive no compensation. This is similar in that the 2 fighters are both neglected and you entered into an agreement to just lose a fighter. Just throwing that out there, since we are in a roster freeze as well, and technically Chandler should not be allowed to be dropped, despite the stipulation.
Also, will Chandler's record count towards your Win% for the GP?
|
|
|
Post by The Sandmen on Mar 1, 2013 20:50:13 GMT -5
Go read the challenge Chandler issued. The details were there a week ago. If you have issue with the challenge, go back a week and bitch then.
And yes, Chandler's record counts.
|
|
|
Post by xx - Former Phoenix Fight Club on Mar 1, 2013 20:58:50 GMT -5
I have issue with you receiving a point for a neglected fighter and circumventing, not only the roster freeze, but also your own stupid rule that you instituted to prevent this sort of thing from happening. Yet you also will not allowing GAP to give his own point away or do with it what he likes, since he is still a member of the site, just protesting your silly little rule.
I'm only mentioning this because you're always preaching to us about "point economy" and not giving out free points, but when it comes to you, you put yourself above the rules and take a free point when you really shouldn't be. That's what I have issue with.
|
|
|
Post by The Sandmen on Mar 1, 2013 23:10:31 GMT -5
This challenge was issued around ManMMA 114-115ish. The terms were VERY clear. A few days AFTER that, we announced that as of NEXT season, neglected fighters were getting canned. There is no circumvention happening here at all. Not even slightly. No points were used during the roster freeze, and my Chandler point won't be used until next season.
And as for GAP - the cat quit. He is owed NOTHING. So let's get over that right now. When you QUIT, you are entitled to NOTHING. It's that simple.
|
|
|
Post by xx - Former Phoenix Fight Club on Mar 2, 2013 14:31:28 GMT -5
This challenge was issued around ManMMA 114-115ish. The terms were VERY clear. A few days AFTER that, we announced that as of NEXT season, neglected fighters were getting canned. There is no circumvention happening here at all. Not even slightly. No points were used during the roster freeze, and my Chandler point won't be used until next season. And as for GAP - the cat quit. He is owed NOTHING. So let's get over that right now. When you QUIT, you are entitled to NOTHING. It's that simple. I disagree on both counts. You can hide behind your "terms" and all that jazz, all you like, cat... you still shouldn't be getting a point for Chandler since it was a career vs. career type of match and it was the 2 neglected fighters that were the only things on the line; not points. Virtually puts no risk involved in doing that fight. It's like if I'd actually taken Cannon's challenge... Obviously I'd take the points if they were available, but I wouldn't expect to get points for the fighters I'd have to drop, if I lost in that case, because the stipulation was releasing fighters. I just don't feel it's right that you should get a point for Chandler based on the new rule that was established because he was a neglected fighter or you change the rule to getting the 1 point compensation for the neglected fighters if they get to 5 losses in a row. I was VERY clear about that not being fair when you posted that stupid rule and it's still unfair now. But by taking a point for Chandler in this situation, I believe you're basically just laughing in the face of your own new rule and basically making it a joke. That's just how I feel. If the admins don't have to adhere to the rules, why should the members?
|
|
|
Post by The Sandmen on Mar 2, 2013 14:51:07 GMT -5
Nice essay ya got there Phoenix. I'm not gonna bother reading them until you learn to be succinct.
Gist from before, since I know you are just repeating yourself to no end in that diatribe, the terms of this fight were made clear when the challenge was issued, and the point part was actually only in there cause I figured CHandler would destroy Dodson/Florian and didn't want to scam either team, so, yeah.
Challenge to Dodson or Florian
Terms were clear.
Challenge accepted by Florian.
Fight happened.
Terms carried out.
None of it affected you.
Get over it.
End.
|
|
Ferocity
Black Belt (5th Degree)
Posts: 3,455
|
Post by Ferocity on Mar 2, 2013 14:53:14 GMT -5
good fight?
|
|
|
Post by xx - Former Phoenix Fight Club on Mar 2, 2013 15:00:31 GMT -5
Nice essay ya got there Phoenix. I'm not gonna bother reading them until you learn to be succinct. Gist from before, since I know you are just repeating yourself to no end in that diatribe, the terms of this fight were made clear when the challenge was issued, and the point part was actually only in there cause I figured CHandler would destroy Dodson/Florian and didn't want to scam either team, so, yeah. Challenge to Dodson or Florian Terms were clear. Challenge accepted by Florian. Fight happened. Terms carried out. None of it affected you. Get over it. End. That was no essay... ROFL I've posted things WAY longer than that. Yet I do find it hilarious that you keep pointing out how I repeat myself, but the thing is that if you actually acknowledged any of my points instead of dismiss them completely, as many of you do, I wouldn't have to repeat myself... repeat myself. End of story.
|
|
|
Post by The Sandmen on Mar 2, 2013 15:37:51 GMT -5
Do you watch The Middle? Cause I totally read that second "repeat myself" like Brick from The Middle.
|
|
|
Post by xx - Former Phoenix Fight Club on Mar 2, 2013 15:39:47 GMT -5
Do you watch The Middle? Cause I totally read that second "repeat myself" like Brick from The Middle. lol No, haven't seen it.
|
|
|
Post by xx - Camp Cannon on Mar 3, 2013 15:30:09 GMT -5
yay point
|
|