Cain Velasquez back to Rocketmen

[The Sandmen]

Oct 19, 2014 0:25:15 GMT -5 @kadri43 said:

Oct 18, 2014 23:49:18 GMT -5 The Sandmen said:

So you'd have no problem giving that free fighter back then?

Sure once I have a better fighter replacing them.

Posted here for processing once season is over.

[Deleted]

Uh no.

[Deleted]

I hope you do know that I was talking about Coleman when I said that.

[The Sandmen]

Coleman was not your free fighter. Cain was, and there is no reason that he should not go back to Rocketmen at the end of the season.

[Deleted]

There is since he was one of the reasons I joined this site. Your guys promo on TheGMX was that if somebody joined they would get a free fighter. I joined and I'm keeping my free fighter. As simple as that.

[The Sandmen]

Nah, I'll keep you to your word. You said you'd give him back, and he is better than any HW Rocketmen has, so after the GP, I'll send him back to Rocketmen. You said you would give back your free fighter, so you will. Fair is fair.

[Deleted]

As I said I meant Coleman. I will give Coleman back when I have a stronger HW fighter than him. Velasquez is my fighter and I'm not moving him until I decide to. You have no say in it whatsoever.

[The Sandmen]

YOu already had your say, it said this:

Oct 19, 2014 0:25:15 GMT -5 @kadri43 said:

Oct 18, 2014 23:49:18 GMT -5 The Sandmen said:

So you'd have no problem giving that free fighter back then?

Sure once I have a better fighter replacing them.

[Deleted]

Yes and for a 3rd time I meant Coleman.

[Ferocity]

um I think maybe he meant Coleman? Also anyone give a shit what The Rocketmen thinks? or you know, do we just decide what happens to his team without him? (I'm ok with this but he might not be)

[Deleted]

Both fighters are mine so he shouldn't have a say if I lose him because he wants him.

[The Rocketmen]

Did I say I wanted him? I'd like my charity fighter back, or course, but I won't force someone to return him. I'll gladly make an exchange.

[Deleted]

Depends on the return.

[xx - Team GAP]

point 1) Bulldozers is right that nobody should be saying that he automatically loses a fighter. Buldozers should be the one deciding when he gives back or IF he gives back a fighter.. It is Buldozers team he gets to decide when he moves a fighter nobody else gets that decision.

point 2) Bulldozers already lost a fighter (coenen) cause he was on top of the league. as much as I'd love to say share the wealth bulldozer already has.

point 3) Bulldozer is greedy.

point 4) I like sandwiches.

[The Sandmen]

Point 1) Bulldozers has a history of making threats or claims that he has no intentions of following through on (he has quit here twice, and GMX once, each time swiftly changing his mind after his action accomplished nothing)

Point 2) He was warned not to make claims he had no intention of following through on both the first and second time he quit here.

Point 3) In order to try to prove a point, he made a bold claim (that the fighter he was given for free could be returned (hence the first quote).

Point 4) In order to follow through on the "Bulldozers, I have had enough of your baseless claims just to get attention" I have full intentions of ensuring he follow through with this one, as this is not kindergarten and words mean things in the grown up world.