|
|
Post by xx - Former Phoenix Fight Club on Sept 10, 2013 9:35:19 GMT -5
What's this "thought" crap.  I still do think it was better. Not that Clone High was bad, I just preferred Undergrads. Though it's interesting, you don't deny Keeping Up with the Kardashians. haha..  |
|
|
|
Post by The Sandmen on Sept 10, 2013 18:14:50 GMT -5
Wait, someone above said The Flintstones was better than The Simpsons....can we rewind and explain that one for me?
|
|
Ferocity
Black Belt (5th Degree)
Posts: 3,455
|
Post by Ferocity on Sept 10, 2013 19:01:13 GMT -5
They did? sacrilege.
|
|
|
|
Post by xx - Former Phoenix Fight Club on Sept 10, 2013 19:40:16 GMT -5
Again, just preference... I grew up on The Flinstones and Bugs Bunny, like old school Looney Tunes... anvils, bombs, transvestite bunnies... lol
|
|
|
|
Post by The Rocketmen on Sept 10, 2013 19:42:35 GMT -5
That's like saying "being blind is better than seeing because I totes know blind people." It makes no sense, will never make sense, and you should punish yourself for speaking such blasphemy.
|
|
|
|
Post by xx - Former Phoenix Fight Club on Sept 10, 2013 19:45:09 GMT -5
Why? I never said the Simpsons sucked. I like the Simpsons.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Sandmen on Sept 10, 2013 20:29:39 GMT -5
That's like saying "being blind is better than seeing because I totes know blind people." That's exactly what he is saying...it's subjective. If you don't have vision, you don't know it. Period. It's like you presuming being able to see is better than being born blind. Blind culture is a thing, anddismissing it as inferior just because it is not "the norm" is on par with liking Flintstones better than Simpsons. Though one is a matter of taste and the other is just short-sightedness (pun somewhat intended) |
|
|
|
Post by xx - Team GAP on Sept 11, 2013 6:00:11 GMT -5
I enjoyed the flintstones for it's time because it had a good story and it was enjoyable and entertaining. sometimes it was funny. and dino jumping on fred was awesome! Twinkletoes fred flintstone was the best damn bowler ever!! He would beat homer any day of the week. Simpsons is also a very good show. which is better I can't say but both shows have their merits... BUT The Flintstones was the 1966 version of the simpsons. Same premise a cartoon family going about their everyday business and dealing with a situation and being funny then coming back next week to do it all over again. Flintstones were the originals
|
|
Ferocity
Black Belt (5th Degree)
Posts: 3,455
|
Post by Ferocity on Sept 11, 2013 13:55:32 GMT -5
I have never thought to compare the two but you're not wrong xx - Team GAP. I'm not sure you're right... but you're not wrong. |
|
|
|
Post by The Rocketmen on Sept 12, 2013 4:44:07 GMT -5
There's this middle ground, and the ground opens up and sucks in all hope and all is lost. It's like where Fox TV shows go to die.
|
|
|
|
Post by xx - Team GAP on Sept 12, 2013 5:13:29 GMT -5
just like Lost..
|
|
|
|
Post by The Rocketmen on Sept 12, 2013 8:41:57 GMT -5
Exactly like Lost.
|
|
I still do think it was better. Not that Clone High was bad, I just preferred Undergrads. Though it's interesting, you don't deny Keeping Up with the Kardashians. haha.. 
Have 9 points in celebration of this monumental achievement!