|
Post by xx - Camp Cannon on Nov 21, 2014 0:14:38 GMT -5
They got the CRTC approval, which is why they're now able to sell the service to other providers. The problem is the exclusive deal WWE signed with Rogers prevents them from putting the Netflix style format into place for Canada; it can only be the straight network, the PPVs, then the limited on demand content. It's worth it to get the PPVs though. What is the difference between WWE Net Pak and WWE Network? As WWE Network is not approved for carriage in Canada yet, WWE Net Pak is a preview or sample of the best WWE Network programming that is being carried in Canada as a monthly Pay Per View subscription package. The most important aspect is that WWE Net Pak still carries all the great monthly Pay Per View events like WWE Summerslam at no additional cost! That’s a savings for any WWE fan of over $50 each month! The main differences are that WWE Net Pak in Canada has both an HD and SD TV channel along with an On Demand channel, while WWE Network is strictly an online service in the United States that has both the streaming live video (shown on Net Pak’s HD/SD channels) but also the vast WWE Library online. When will the full WWE Network be available? Rogers is working with the WWE to seek permission from the CRTC (the regulatory body that oversees broadcasting in Canada) to carry the full WWE Network in Canada. This application process, through to approval by the CRTC, if successful, can take several months. Unfortunately, there is no specific timeline that we can provide.
|
|
|
Post by The Sandmen on Nov 21, 2014 2:17:20 GMT -5
Cannon, for fuck sakes, when you copy and paste shit off of a website, CITE YOUR SOURCES!
|
|
|
Post by xx - Camp Cannon on Nov 21, 2014 19:29:29 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by The Sandmen on Nov 21, 2014 19:36:56 GMT -5
I would never get any service with Rogers. Nor Bell.
|
|
|
Post by xx - Camp Cannon on Nov 21, 2014 20:52:38 GMT -5
I would never get any service with Rogers. Nor Bell. cause you sir suck
|
|
|
Post by xx - Team GAP on Nov 22, 2014 3:26:27 GMT -5
actually I believe the proper grammer would be "Cause you suck, Sir"
|
|
|
Post by The Sandmen on Nov 22, 2014 5:21:53 GMT -5
actually I believe the proper grammer would be "Cause you suck, Sir" Actually,*, grammar*, Because*
|
|
|
Post by xx - Team GAP on Nov 23, 2014 17:11:55 GMT -5
well if you want to use actual words .... yes you would be correct.
|
|
|
Post by The Sandmen on Nov 23, 2014 17:13:51 GMT -5
Cannon appears rarely concerned with actual words.
|
|
|
Post by xx - Team GAP on Nov 23, 2014 17:16:33 GMT -5
Then how I corrected him is acurrate
|
|
|
Post by The Sandmen on Nov 23, 2014 17:17:53 GMT -5
It would have been, but you said "proper grammer", which was when I came in and "proper grammar"'ed your "proper grammer".
|
|
|
Post by xx - Team GAP on Nov 24, 2014 6:23:40 GMT -5
it's "craig grammer"
|
|
|
Post by The Rocketmen on Nov 24, 2014 6:56:22 GMT -5
I want to be your... BAH BAH.... CRAIG HAMMER
|
|
|
Post by The Sandmen on Nov 24, 2014 19:06:19 GMT -5
The Rocketmen - you should have kept Brock. Then you could be... The Brocketmen!
|
|
|
Post by xx - Team GAP on Nov 24, 2014 20:10:38 GMT -5
I want to be your... BAH BAH.... CRAIG HAMMER I have a craig hammer but your not it.
|
|