|
Post by The Rocketmen on Aug 8, 2017 13:40:00 GMT -5
Not burrying The Sandmen post, but I updated my rant to include what each fighter's cap is for each belt won. The only division that has any supporting evidence of A fighters winning things over the last 3 seasons is the HW division.
|
|
|
Post by The Sandmen on Aug 8, 2017 14:08:02 GMT -5
Not burrying The Sandmen post, but I updated my rant to include what each fighter's cap is for each belt won. The only division that has any supporting evidence of A fighters winning things over the last 3 seasons is the HW division. Even then, I feel like there are some pretty clear reasons for why that may be: 1) We have more A-ranked fighters at HW. 2) HW is where the more popular A-ranked fighters are (Liddell, Brock, Couture, Jones, Velasquez, Tito, Shogun). 3) Most people have been developing HWs for much longer. I remember when I was pretty much the only person working on my LW for a long stretch.
|
|
|
Post by The Rocketmen on Aug 8, 2017 14:14:53 GMT -5
Not burrying The Sandmen post, but I updated my rant to include what each fighter's cap is for each belt won. The only division that has any supporting evidence of A fighters winning things over the last 3 seasons is the HW division. Even then, I feel like there are some pretty clear reasons for why that may be: 1) We have more A-ranked fighters at HW. 2) HW is where the more popular A-ranked fighters are (Liddell, Brock, Couture, Jones, Velasquez, Tito, Shogun). 3) Most people have been developing HWs for much longer. I remember when I was pretty much the only person working on my LW for a long stretch. I believe that was because of the fact in the first like 30 fight cards, we were an open-weight site. So HW just naturally were stronger than lighter fellows, so once we embraced weight classes, that separation started to happen, but not before the first like 6 months was mostly posts for points, and furiously upgrading giant fighters.
|
|
|
Post by xx - Camp Cannon on Aug 8, 2017 15:00:23 GMT -5
i still cant believe all that sandmen be saying after all he said tapology wasnt a fan based voting system which it actually is... tried make me look in the wrong when he was..
|
|
|
Post by The Sandmen on Aug 8, 2017 15:02:19 GMT -5
i still cant believe all that sandmen be saying after all he said tapology wasnt a fan based voting system which it actually is... tried make me look in the wrong when he was.. I never once said it was not fan-based voting. But just like IMDB's top 250, it still gives you a good, objective, 3rd-party consensus about quality, relative to the site. As I said, if your problem is with Tapology, I can solve that by making the rankings myself. You are redirecting now that your original suggestion has no traction.
|
|
|
Post by xx - Camp Cannon on Aug 8, 2017 15:09:16 GMT -5
i still cant believe all that sandmen be saying after all he said tapology wasnt a fan based voting system which it actually is... tried make me look in the wrong when he was.. I never once said it was not fan-based voting. But just like IMDB's top 250, it still gives you a good, objective, 3rd-party consensus about quality, relative to the site. As I said, if your problem is with Tapology, I can solve that by making the rankings myself. You are redirecting now that your original suggestion has no traction. really rampage jackson an a rank like obviously the whole island of japan voted.. not only that i dont trust your biasty
|
|
|
Post by The Sandmen on Aug 8, 2017 15:18:32 GMT -5
Find me a site better than Tapology and I will use it. It was the best one I could find. And keep in mind, when I find stuff, I actually put time and work into that. I don;t just bitch about it on a site until someone else fixes it for me.
Find a better list, have me do rankings, or shut the fuck up. Right now, all you are doing is whining about something without trying to improve it.
You are not the president of the United States, crying to a bunch of mindless sheep here, who will blindly follow anything you do or claim. Back your shit up. Find a better list, or accept that Tapology was the best one there and move on with your life.
This ignores the fact that you have not even shown there is a problem in the first place, other than your perpetual man-child-tears.
|
|
|
Post by xx - Camp Cannon on Aug 8, 2017 15:31:47 GMT -5
Find me a site better than Tapology and I will use it. It was the best one I could find. And keep in mind, when I find stuff, I actually put time and work into that. I don;t just bitch about it on a site until someone else fixes it for me. Find a better list, have me do rankings, or shut the fuck up. Right now, all you are doing is whining about something without trying to improve it. You are not the president of the United States, crying to a bunch of mindless sheep here, who will blindly follow anything you do or claim. Back your shit up. Find a better list, or accept that Tapology was the best one there and move on with your life. This ignores the fact that you have not even shown there is a problem in the first place, other than your perpetual man-child-tears. stroke your ego some more everytime i said it was fan based popularity voyte you'd say nah.. like i want a bunch of Texas Hillbillys and The Sandmen voting best fighters for me
|
|
|
Post by The Rocketmen on Aug 8, 2017 15:49:08 GMT -5
Find me a site better than Tapology and I will use it. It was the best one I could find. And keep in mind, when I find stuff, I actually put time and work into that. I don;t just bitch about it on a site until someone else fixes it for me. Find a better list, have me do rankings, or shut the fuck up. Right now, all you are doing is whining about something without trying to improve it. You are not the president of the United States, crying to a bunch of mindless sheep here, who will blindly follow anything you do or claim. Back your shit up. Find a better list, or accept that Tapology was the best one there and move on with your life. This ignores the fact that you have not even shown there is a problem in the first place, other than your perpetual man-child-tears. stroke your ego some more everytime i said it was fan based popularity voyte you'd say nah.. like i want a bunch of Texas Hillbillys and The Sandmen voting best fighters for me I just shared literally ample evidence about how your "problem" with the site is complete bullshit. At this point, there's no sense "debating" how you're wrong and I'll just put it plainly. You're just kind of a dumb-dumb.
|
|
|
Post by The Texas Rattlesnakes on Aug 8, 2017 15:59:04 GMT -5
Find me a site better than Tapology and I will use it. It was the best one I could find. And keep in mind, when I find stuff, I actually put time and work into that. I don;t just bitch about it on a site until someone else fixes it for me. Find a better list, have me do rankings, or shut the fuck up. Right now, all you are doing is whining about something without trying to improve it. You are not the president of the United States, crying to a bunch of mindless sheep here, who will blindly follow anything you do or claim. Back your shit up. Find a better list, or accept that Tapology was the best one there and move on with your life. This ignores the fact that you have not even shown there is a problem in the first place, other than your perpetual man-child-tears. stroke your ego some more everytime i said it was fan based popularity voyte you'd say nah.. like i want a bunch of Texas Hillbillys and The Sandmen voting best fighters for me Once again. I'm not from Texas. I'm from Michigan, and Once again, I'm probably more north than you.
|
|
|
Post by xx - Camp Cannon on Aug 8, 2017 20:29:36 GMT -5
stroke your ego some more everytime i said it was fan based popularity voyte you'd say nah.. like i want a bunch of Texas Hillbillys and The Sandmen voting best fighters for me Once again. I'm not from Texas. I'm from Michigan, and Once again, I'm probably more north than you. id you mean north like american redneck you're absolutely right..
|
|
|
Post by The Rocketmen on Aug 8, 2017 21:11:08 GMT -5
Once again. I'm not from Texas. I'm from Michigan, and Once again, I'm probably more north than you. id you mean north like american redneck you're absolutely right..
|
|
|
Post by xx - Camp Cannon on Aug 8, 2017 21:12:50 GMT -5
id you mean north like american redneck you're absolutely right.. is turtle your nickname from sandmen seem like u can never form an opinion on your own and always side with him? butt darts much?
|
|
|
Post by xx - Camp Cannon on Aug 8, 2017 21:19:32 GMT -5
maybe u should take over the ismming for him as he doesnt want ryan jimmo on same footing as fedor it can be ur only non failed sim site
|
|
|
Post by The Rocketmen on Aug 8, 2017 21:56:43 GMT -5
maybe u should take over the ismming for him as he doesnt want ryan jimmo on same footing as fedor it can be ur only non failed sim site How many sim sites have you run? How many sim sites have you joined and then quit because you're a miserable tool who can't tough it out when shit isn't handed over to him hand over fist? Just curious. Because it seems that Justin and I create and manage just pure garbage, and yet there you are, eating up all the garbage and complaining about the smell. You want Ryan Jimmo to be a champion. You want posts for points to return, even though you would have acquired about 1/5th of the points we've literally GIFTED you JUST for fucking existing. That's it. That's all you had to do. Exist, get rewarded for being alive, and then upgrade your fighters. The problem? You are incredibly fantastic at sucking dick at upgrading fighters. Like, so good it's baffling. And yet, you win belts. How is that even possible? Your answer? System is rigged, but not in your favor. You win belts, but we're cheating against you. You get free points, but we're cheating against you. You get to come on here, accuse everyone of literally foiling the site in our favor, despite us being incredibly vocal about preferring to lose on here for the enjoyment of others (see every single trade I've ever made, and look at where my team is in the standings). And why am I not complaining? Because I enjoy the site? Because I enjoy supporting my "friend's" passion project? No. It's because I'm a homosexual stalker on a forum-based site where I look for ways to sexually assault some guy I knew in College, and then defend him when someone is frustrated by his boyish good looks. But what do I know? I'm clearly not as close a friend of his as you are. After all, didn't you pretty much grow up with him? And yet, here you are, literally criticizing every ounce of fun out of the site with nonsensical arguments about literally fucking nothing. Some friend you are. I'll stick to stalking. Somehow, my harassment has more respect in it than your literal friendship. Dumb dumb.
|
|