|
Post by xx - Former Phoenix Fight Club on Oct 13, 2016 0:39:14 GMT -5
You're not, nor do you get paid to be an MMA analyst, nor are you any sort of expert on the sport. You're just a fan like the rest of us. Funny you should say that because there was a time a few years ago Mike and I WERE paid to be MMA analysts, when we had our own MMA podcast on FvF. But you are redirecting things here. Fan or analyst, I'm still the unfortunate block who has the burden of this site on his shoulders, and I'm still adding some restrictions. So, if you guys want to be a part of that discussion rather than just sticking with the guidelines I put forth above, by all means please make a list of guys who are currently on ManMMA who would not be eligible to be here based on my proposed guidelines. That would be incredibly useful in seeing where I have left gaps in the current suggested criteria. Do that, I'll see where the excessive restrictions lie, then we can correct them. Please make a list of guys for you so you can take them out of the system? Why would we do that for you?
|
|
|
Post by The Sandmen on Oct 13, 2016 0:55:12 GMT -5
On ManMMA not ManNXT correct? Correct.
|
|
|
Post by The Sandmen on Oct 13, 2016 0:56:27 GMT -5
Please make a list of guys for you so you can take them out of the system? Why would we do that for you? For the most part, anyone who is here has not caused me to think they were making a mockery of the site. If you make a list, and we find a pattern of guys I feel should be here, I can find out where the loophole exists in the guidelines and fix it.
|
|
|
Post by xx - Camp Cannon on Oct 13, 2016 2:57:16 GMT -5
You're not, nor do you get paid to be an MMA analyst, nor are you any sort of expert on the sport. You're just a fan like the rest of us. Funny you should say that because there was a time a few years ago Mike and I WERE paid to be MMA analysts, when we had our own MMA podcast on FvF. But you are redirecting things here. Fan or analyst, I'm still the unfortunate block who has the burden of this site on his shoulders, and I'm still adding some restrictions. So, if you guys want to be a part of that discussion rather than just sticking with the guidelines I put forth above, by all means please make a list of guys who are currently on ManMMA who would not be eligible to be here based on my proposed guidelines. That would be incredibly useful in seeing where I have left gaps in the current suggested criteria. Do that, I'll see where the excessive restrictions lie, then we can correct them. yeah that didnt last and wasnt even being listened too
|
|
|
Post by The Sandmen on Oct 13, 2016 2:59:40 GMT -5
It lasted for a year or two, I don't remember and at our peak, we had about 200 listeners. Pretty damned good for having literally 0 advertising.
Also, what are you hoping to accomplish by trying to shit on my accomplishments here, dude? Think that will help you get your way or something? Grow the fuck up.
|
|
|
Post by xx - Former Phoenix Fight Club on Oct 13, 2016 3:00:35 GMT -5
Please make a list of guys for you so you can take them out of the system? Why would we do that for you? For the most part, anyone who is here has not caused me to think they were making a mockery of the site. If you make a list, and we find a pattern of guys I feel should be here, I can find out where the loophole exists in the guidelines and fix it. Anyone who's currently on rosters you mean... lol There aren't any right now... But I do know that there's guys/gals on my roster that give you fits that you don't think should be here... And that's kind of the point... fighters can be developed. If someone wants to make a project out of Phil Brooks, then let them. To you, it might seem like a mockery, but to the person developing that fighter it's not. Do you know how ecstatic I'd be if, say, Jason MacDonald won that MW belt? Or D'Alelio out wrestled Jedrzejczyk for the FW belt? But you would consider that a mockery cuz their not "Legends" and you don't think their worth spit. It's honestly half the reason why I think most of my top fighter that have circled through here haven't won the big one, or won the GP, and and only get titles once every few seasons... It's cuz I know what you think of my team and it'd be really easy for you to have it so that I don't succeed, being I know the program too. That's not saying that you are or you aren't... That's simply saying, it'd be really easy to do, to anyone, if you saw fit to do so. And don't say "I don't have the time for that" cuz it takes less than a second to hit a button, and if you're as adamant about this as you seem to be, you'd make the "time" to get it "right" in your eyes and throw people bones with a win or 2, here and there, then a title once in a while to keep them interested. But, in short, the list would be a waste our time, mostly a waste of mine, since we both have differing opinions on who good fighters are and who aren't, save for the mainstays, and you'd make me go through all that bullshit to tell me I wasted my time cuz we rarely agree on anything. Not only that, but you're trying to get me to do it just so you can do that... no matter what gets come up with. lol I'm not playing that game dude. I see exactly what you're trying to do, and I'm not that stupid. It's actually kind of insulting that you think I am. TBH
|
|
|
Post by The Sandmen on Oct 13, 2016 3:05:13 GMT -5
Then the current list of criteria are fine and you have no further specific suggestions to modify, add, or remove before we move forward with it?
|
|
|
Post by The Rocketmen on Oct 13, 2016 14:34:58 GMT -5
I don't remember people hating on us when the radio show was on... I also don't see anyone else on this site that got paid to talk about the sport lol
|
|
|
Post by The Sandmen on Oct 16, 2016 20:49:14 GMT -5
Updated.
|
|
|
Post by xx - Former Phoenix Fight Club on Oct 20, 2016 12:17:51 GMT -5
That's more clear and concise. Thank you. I have no problem with that now. Makes more sense, even though I think Puder and/or O'Hare should be eligible and also anyone that has been in ManMMA already (ie. Bautista)... these addendums atleast make more sense.
|
|
|
Post by Lord Byron's Conquistadors on Oct 24, 2016 0:35:19 GMT -5
That's more clear and concise. Thank you. I have no problem with that now. Makes more sense, even though I think Puder and/or O'Hare should be eligible and also anyone that has been in ManMMA already (ie. Bautista)... these addendums atleast make more sense. what changed? *I donno if I know what changed?
|
|
|
Post by The Rocketmen on Oct 24, 2016 7:11:53 GMT -5
I'm just waiting for an official announcement (unless there was one already that I didn't see) to know exactly what is going on at this point.
|
|
|
Post by The Sandmen on Oct 24, 2016 7:56:47 GMT -5
I'm just waiting for an official announcement (unless there was one already that I didn't see) to know exactly what is going on at this point. The original post has been updated, and what is written is what we are going with. It may be edited between now and the draft, but the draft page will link to this page as a reminder of who is eligible
|
|
|
Post by The Rocketmen on Oct 24, 2016 8:10:32 GMT -5
perfect, thank you
|
|