|
|
Post by xx - Camp Cannon on Oct 23, 2018 20:51:44 GMT -5
wait u mean dana dont run invicta thought he did lol talent wise he does
|
|
|
|
Post by The Texas Rattlesnakes on Oct 23, 2018 21:11:11 GMT -5
I feel like a lot of Cannon's sentences begin with, "but I thought..."
|
|
|
|
Post by xx - Camp Cannon on Oct 23, 2018 21:24:50 GMT -5
I feel like a lot of Cannon's sentences begin with, "but I thought..." lol it true ddana takes invictas taleent thier ufc womans far team |
|
|
|
Post by xx - Camp Cannon on Oct 23, 2018 21:25:31 GMT -5
I feel like a lot of Cannon's sentences begin with, "but I thought..." just do ur manmma jobs thats the only reason youre here india |
|
|
|
Post by xx - Team GAP on Oct 24, 2018 10:26:37 GMT -5
really why we arguing about ronda beating a no namer when we should be discussing that she should get immediate title shot for the incompenence of The Sandmenronda is back of the line.... try fighting your way up to the top |
|
|
|
Post by The Texas Rattlesnakes on Oct 24, 2018 10:51:01 GMT -5
Even though she's ranked 2 and on a win streak lol
|
|
|
|
Post by xx - Former Phoenix Fight Club on Oct 24, 2018 14:02:17 GMT -5
Even though she's ranked 2 and on a win streak lol Which is hilarious in and of itself right now after that jank performance 😂 Though I do find the rankings to be a bit by name weighted sometimes rather than just performance. Rousey comes out and somehow gets a decision win on a shitty performance whereas Jules was fantastic in this fight, yet her rank will either stay the same, or go down, and she won't get a tournament berth either because this was a loss, unfortunately. |
|
|
|
Post by ~ josh ~ on Oct 24, 2018 17:21:49 GMT -5
hi
|
|
|
|
Post by The Killing Joke on Oct 24, 2018 17:38:18 GMT -5
fuck ya want kid? Get lost on the way to Club Penguin? |
|
|
|
Post by The Sandmen on Oct 24, 2018 17:49:35 GMT -5
Though I do find the rankings to be a bit by name weighted sometimes rather than just performance. I don't do the rankings personally, but I get updates on how they are updated. Names play absolutely no part, since, during the season, it's 100% about who you beat (and where that person was ranked). Off-season, people's positions usually get a review, and if someone is on a major winning streak they might get pushed up over someone who is on a major losing streak. In-season (and definitely by this point of the season), your ranking means you beat someone of that ranking to earn the ranking you have. hope that clarified things for you some.  Unrelated, regardless of rankings and win streaks, I have full intentions of rematching this fight, since it was decent, and close, and controversial. All the makings of a rematchable fight, britches! |
|
|
|
Post by xx - Former Phoenix Fight Club on Oct 24, 2018 18:02:47 GMT -5
Though I do find the rankings to be a bit by name weighted sometimes rather than just performance. I don't do the rankings personally, but I get updates on how they are updated. Names play absolutely no part, since, during the season, it's 100% about who you beat (and where that person was ranked). Off-season, people's positions usually get a review, and if someone is on a major winning streak they might get pushed up over someone who is on a major losing streak. In-season (and definitely by this point of the season), your ranking means you beat someone of that ranking to earn the ranking you have. hope that clarified things for you some. I didn't ask... So no... You didn't clear anything up at all. I do find them to be very name weighted, regardless of what you claim to the contrary. |
|
|
|
Post by xx - Camp Cannon on Oct 24, 2018 18:12:59 GMT -5
I don't do the rankings personally, but I get updates on how they are updated. Names play absolutely no part, since, during the season, it's 100% about who you beat (and where that person was ranked). Off-season, people's positions usually get a review, and if someone is on a major winning streak they might get pushed up over someone who is on a major losing streak. In-season (and definitely by this point of the season), your ranking means you beat someone of that ranking to earn the ranking you have. hope that clarified things for you some. I didn't ask... So no... You didn't clear anything up at all. I do find them to be very name weighted, regardless of what you claim to the contrary. they should be name rated too rousey hom an a and carano maybe a c and julie whatever her no name face is an f thus nno chance of beating rousey and holm irl on here its suppose 2 be realistic |
|
|
|
Post by xx - Camp Cannon on Oct 24, 2018 18:13:33 GMT -5
if there a name raanking system 4 men why not womens only seems about right
|
|
|
|
Post by xx - Former Phoenix Fight Club on Oct 24, 2018 18:25:24 GMT -5
if there a name raanking system 4 men why not womens only seems about right There isn't names ranking for either men's or women's... It just seems like it cuz mostly the same fighters are in there all the time. It's rare to see anyone different, unfortunately. |
|
|
|
Post by xx - Camp Cannon on Oct 24, 2018 18:31:01 GMT -5
if there a name raanking system 4 men why not womens only seems about right There isn't names ranking for either men's or women's... It just seems like it cuz mostly the same fighters are in there all the time. It's rare to see anyone different, unfortunately. what the fuck r u talking about the mens is a name popularity poll on ranker.com or w/e the sites called |
|
x8 
Have 9 points in celebration of this monumental achievement!
Jan 21, 2021 13:09:55 GMT -5
*
