|
|
Post by xx - Camp Cannon on Oct 25, 2018 20:45:05 GMT -5
I really don't mean to be rude when I say this... but could the less smart people STOP fucking referring to Letter Grades as the Rankings?! ok so the a system ranking was brought here for realism so an e cant win the belt or be as good as anderson silva, thus sandmen created fighters out of his best estimations and these supposedly a ranking are sucking cuz they were built probably too well rounded thus sandmen gives us 2 points a week to fix his mistakes are you saying we should get more points or get rid of the a - e ranking system? |
|
|
|
Post by The Rocketmen on Oct 25, 2018 20:47:57 GMT -5
I really don't mean to be rude when I say this... but could the less smart people STOP fucking referring to Letter Grades as the Rankings?! ok so the a system ranking was brought here for realism so an e cant win the belt or be as good as anderson silva, thus sandmen created fighters out of his best estimations and these supposedly a ranking are sucking cuz they were built probably too well rounded thus sandmen gives us 2 points a week to fix his mistakes are you saying we should get more points or get rid of the a - e ranking system?  |
|
|
|
Post by xx - Camp Cannon on Oct 25, 2018 20:50:48 GMT -5
ok so the a system ranking was brought here for realism so an e cant win the belt or be as good as anderson silva, thus sandmen created fighters out of his best estimations and these supposedly a ranking are sucking cuz they were built probably too well rounded thus sandmen gives us 2 points a week to fix his mistakes are you saying we should get more points or get rid of the a - e ranking system? great so your saying i should spend 30 points on a fighter sandmen messed up and 4 lord anderson silva and gina carano(dunno how) to be the best? |
|
|
|
Post by xx - Camp Cannon on Oct 25, 2018 20:53:24 GMT -5
@tleast the managers league was fair you got too assign your points from scrap and wasnt based on someone speculations
|
|
|
|
Post by The Sandmen on Oct 25, 2018 21:44:03 GMT -5
As I have said many times, after you put about 5-6 points into your fighter, that overrides any build I make for them. But even forgetting that, with the ability to subtract points, your argument that "my speculations" are somehow affecting someone's build, for bettor or worse, is moot as fuck.
|
|
|
|
Post by xx - Camp Cannon on Oct 25, 2018 21:45:21 GMT -5
As I have said many times, after you put about 5-6 points into your fighter, that overrides any build I make for them. But even forgetting that, with the ability to subtract points, your argument that "my speculations" are somehow affecting someone's build, for bettor or worse, is moot as fuck. hardly theres only 20 points to be put into said fighter(s) |
|
|
|
Post by xx - Former Phoenix Fight Club on Oct 25, 2018 22:34:48 GMT -5
That's for upgrading purposes, Normand... lol What we're talking about are the actual ManMMA site rankings... You know... The little numbers in front of some fighters on our cards?! 😜 and im talking about the letter grade rankings where julie kedzie should be an f to rousey a Fair enough... No one else was. lol 😜 But if you do wanna get into that, I'd give Rousey a mid-low B, at best... only because of her win streak due to opponents going too aggro on her to start fights... Or Ronda cheated. 😉 lol Rousey was a one trick pony that was finally exploited though. Sort of the same with Carano too... She only started getting decent on the ground just before she retired. Both were deadly at one thing though... No argument there. Kedzie would likely be a mid-high C. Her only championship came @ Jackson, granted, but she was always at forefront of women's MMA right from the start. The only real true "A's" in women's MMA for our purposes are really Nakai & Tate and maybe JJ & Holm... But even the latter two have their cracks. It's still too early in the women's MMA evolution to draw a definitive line. |
|
|
|
Post by The Texas Rattlesnakes on Oct 25, 2018 23:16:48 GMT -5
and im talking about the letter grade rankings where julie kedzie should be an f to rousey a Fair enough... No one else was. lol 😜 But if you do wanna get into that, I'd give Rousey a mid-low B, at best... only because of her win streak due to opponents going too aggro on her to start fights... Or Ronda cheated. 😉 lol Rousey was a one trick pony that was finally exploited though. Sort of the same with Carano too... She only started getting decent on the ground just before she retired. Both were deadly at one thing though... No argument there. Kedzie would likely be a mid-high C. Her only championship came @ Jackson, granted, but she was always at forefront of women's MMA right from the start. The only real true "A's" in women's MMA for our purposes are really Nakai & Tate and maybe JJ & Holm... But even the latter two have their cracks. It's still too early in the women's MMA evolution to draw a definitive line. Not Nunes, Cyborg, or Schevchenko? Interesting that you'd have Holm as an A |
|
|
|
Post by xx - Former Phoenix Fight Club on Oct 25, 2018 23:39:11 GMT -5
Fair enough... No one else was. lol 😜 But if you do wanna get into that, I'd give Rousey a mid-low B, at best... only because of her win streak due to opponents going too aggro on her to start fights... Or Ronda cheated. 😉 lol Rousey was a one trick pony that was finally exploited though. Sort of the same with Carano too... She only started getting decent on the ground just before she retired. Both were deadly at one thing though... No argument there. Kedzie would likely be a mid-high C. Her only championship came @ Jackson, granted, but she was always at forefront of women's MMA right from the start. The only real true "A's" in women's MMA for our purposes are really Nakai & Tate and maybe JJ & Holm... But even the latter two have their cracks. It's still too early in the women's MMA evolution to draw a definitive line. Not Nunes, Cyborg, or Schevchenko? Interesting that you'd have Holm as an A Yes Cyborg would be an A too. I missed one, sorry, I'm not perfect either. Nunes & Schevchenko would still be "B's", right now. |
|
|
|
Post by The Killing Joke on Oct 26, 2018 5:35:29 GMT -5
In order to be a person who can be ranked yes, they require a name. Unless they are Prince and go by a symbol now. So yes. The rankings are name weighted as most if not all of the fighters that are ranked do, in fact, have a name. You need to rewrite this in the past tense |
|
|
|
Post by The Rocketmen on Oct 26, 2018 5:55:26 GMT -5
In order to be a person who can be ranked yes, they require a name. Unless they are Prince and go by a symbol now. So yes. The rankings are name weighted as most if not all of the fighters that are ranked do, in fact, have a name. You need to rewrite this in the past tense In the past, in order to be a person who could be ranked, they were required to have a name. Unless they were Prince and went by a symbol. So yes, the rankings were name weighted as most, if not all, fighters that were ranked did, in fact, have name. I had to rewrite that in the past tense. |
|
|
|
Post by The Killing Joke on Oct 26, 2018 8:49:32 GMT -5
You need to rewrite this in the past tense In the past, in order to be a person who could be ranked, they were required to have a name. Unless they were Prince and went by a symbol. So yes, the rankings were name weighted as most, if not all, fighters that were ranked did, in fact, have name. I had to rewrite that in the past tense. I was talking about Prince being dead ... |
|
|
|
Post by The Sandmen on Oct 26, 2018 8:51:30 GMT -5
Yeah, stupid!
|
|
|
|
Post by The Rocketmen on Oct 26, 2018 11:50:09 GMT -5
This... took a turn.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Sandmen on Oct 26, 2018 15:04:23 GMT -5
Yeah. It turned stupid. I wonder who did that?
|
|
x8 
Have 9 points in celebration of this monumental achievement!